Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk

The longer we wait, the more it’ll hurt. With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed. Americans are tough, we’ll get through.

I do agree with you, however. No one has the spine to push this issue.


27 posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:31 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

“With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed.”

Judges appointed by a usurper must be objected to in pre-trial phase. After the verdict or ruling, the De Facto Officer Doctrine kicks in to protect the Federal government from chaos and disruption.

Legislation signed into law by a usurper can be objected to individually if specific adverse action is applied to the individual. For example, the IRS assesses an individual taxpayer a tax for not obtaining and maintaining a healthcare insurance policy. The individual can object to the tax assessment on the basis the law was signed by a usurper and does not apply to them because they object to laws signed by the usurper. The law remains ineffect for everyone else, but the IRS cannot tax the individual who formally objects after an assessment.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 8:56:48 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson