Just dwell on this guy's comment for a minute.
Government authoritarianism cloaked in "public safety". And just who defined those who are "potentially dangerous"? And how soon until that definition is expanded to whatever vagaries the Leftists decide?
It is the Leftists, who have sworn allegiance to fascism, who are a grave danger to America.
Just as Beck said yesterday “Just WHO is it they deem dangerous?”
Bipartisan-—Republicans are as willing to trample on your rights (for the right cause) as Democrats.
I've considered this line of thought in the past... say one comes into a situation whereas agents of the gub'mint are violating your rights or posing a serious threat your or your family's life.
You stage a successful defense.
When the event is taken apart and recast/retold by the gub'mint, no matter the reason for their engagement (including wrong address/persons) would the defense given make you a "a dangerous individual" thereby retroactively justifying the gub'mints actions?