Replies

This kind of confirms my belief about the Linux enthusiasts, they have no aesthetic sense whatsoever.

Half of those look like they belong in the 80’s, the others? The 90’s.

This stuff is ugly beyond repair and ranges from MS-DOS quality to the Mac OS pre OS-X in appearance.

Fugly stuff.

7 posted on 05/17/2013 10:35:09 AM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark

To: PittsburghAfterDark

10 posted on 05/17/2013 10:47:20 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)

To: PittsburghAfterDark

"aesthetic" sense? You sound like one of those Apple fanboyz. Who never seem to realize that their "Apple" OS is based on Unix, just like Linux.

Most apple-0-philes have never even seen an Engineering Digest Magazine. In the back they advertise some really high-end software, on the order of about 35k and up just for the basic package. Most companies offer versions that run on Unix, Solaris, IBM 360, HP workstations, IRIS systems, and yes even... MS Win NT 3.0, 4.0, 2000, ME, XP, and Vista.

There are NOOOOOOO options for Apple machines. Blimey... I wonder why that is, eh?

32 posted on 08/15/2013 4:25:52 PM PDT by Utilizer (Ba-con Ah'hkkba'aar! <- In muzlim world are only fast goats & slow boys. Slow goats all dead. ->)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794