Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

I make no agreement to stop talking about the courts. While you may be talking about “accuracy,” I’m talking about real life opinions and findings,
Everybody whose side loses blames the judge and the courts for the defeat,

Keep putting your fingers in your ears and screaming “la la la” but those who are fighting the eligibility battles have relied EXCLUSIVELY on the judiciary as the venue to wage this Constitutional battle. And that’s after one of the very first Triers of Fact to look at this issue told the plaintiffs that Congress was the appropriate branch og governmebt to seek redress of grievances.

There have been 322 civil actions, appeals and Supreme Court cert petitions/applications for stays, injunctions or extraordinary writs.


152 posted on 05/21/2013 3:07:29 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
But your insistence on bringing up whatever the Courts are babbling about INTERFERES with attempts to bring ACCURACY to the discussion.

Rightly or Wrongly, People buy into that fallacy of Authority argument, and they will BELIEVE something simply because someone in Authority TELLS them so.

It is a real problem getting people to think for themselves, and you keep coming along and trying to convince them to let the courts do their thinking for them. This is NOT a service to them or the nation.

155 posted on 05/21/2013 3:20:41 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson