Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
And then you actually have the GALL to actually claim that a judge whose authority never extended to more than a few COUNTIES, whose comments were approved by nobody, is a "better" authority than a United States District Attorney whose work was approved by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

And this is after the relative authority of the two men has been made perfectly clear through prior discussion.

This is totally clownish. And it illustrates what total, complete ideological HACKS birthers are, how completely opposed to the truth birthers are, and what a waste of time it is even engaging in conversation with people who simply love their STUPID FANTASY and don't want to be bothered with the truth.

336 posted on 05/24/2013 7:36:30 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston

YOU are the one who exalts “authority” over reason. YOU can’t even acknowledge the internal conflicts in your position. YOU can’t even acknowledge that you didn’t understand the diagram you copied. And yes YOU refuse to address a point. Calling it BS is not addressing a point.


343 posted on 05/24/2013 11:18:26 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Winston
You keep getting it wrong. Here are the men who compiled the British Statutes in Effect at the time.

Here is where they received their appointments.

You aren't arguing with Roberts, you are arguing with the ENTIRE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA!

358 posted on 05/27/2013 4:13:42 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson