Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston
Therefore, both Marco Rubio (born a US citizen by virtue of birth in the US to non-citizen parents) and Ted Cruz (born a US citizen by virtue of birth abroad to a citizen parent) are natural born citizens, and eligible to the Presidency.

Cruz is a citizen by virtue of naturalization statute.

A statute addressing the very specific circumstance would not have been created if it were not needed.

Yet here you are claiming that a naturalized citizen is a natural born citizen.

Such foolishness. Such incredible foolishness.

345 posted on 05/24/2013 12:05:27 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
Yet here you are claiming that a naturalized citizen is a natural born citizen.

Such foolishness. Such incredible foolishness.

Well, obviously the Signers of the Constitution believed that Congress, under its power to "create a uniform rule of naturalization," had the power to specify which foreign-born persons were to be counted as "natural born citizens" and have the ability to be elected President, because 40% OF THEM, INCLUDING PRESIDENT GEORGE WASHINGTON WHO PRESIDED OVER THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION, PROMPTLY PASSED A LAW DOING EXACTLY THAT.

So when you describe this belief as "foolishness," you are calling the Framers of the Constitution fools.

Once again, you illustrate that there's no length of bat****ery birthers won't go to.

If the Framers themselves disagree with you, then their ideas are "foolishness."

347 posted on 05/24/2013 1:26:02 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson