Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ak267
I think that’s being worked on via the Closed Cycle Brayton Turbines.

You would not need the huge cooling towers and such obviously. And you would not need to collocate with a body of water.

The Brayton Cycle simply means that the power plant will use a gas turbine rather than a steam turbine. Other than that it will not really effect system efficiency much.

The laws of physics require a heat sink to absorb waste heat from any heat engine.

Thermodynamic Process .

Thermodynamic efficiency of any system is limited to about 40%. Because your salt cooled reactor adds a second heat exchanger between the turbine and the heat sink it will be limited to about 30 percent. The other 70% of the heat generated in the reactor has to go somewhere, thus the large body of water.

I work in a 1300 megawatt nuclear plant. That plant generates 3500 megawatts of thermal energy. That leaves 2200 megawatts of waste heat that has to be rejected to some place. We use a rather large cooling tower that has 540,000 gallons per minute flowing through it to cool the turbine’s condenser.

A similar sized salt cooled thorium reactor would need a similar heat sink with a similar water source. There are no exceptions.

16 posted on 06/09/2013 5:49:39 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Pontiac

This is something which will have to be addressed on exact water specifics. If you want specifics, I can recommend John Kutsch of the TEA.

thoriumenergyalliance@gmail.com


17 posted on 06/09/2013 7:06:46 PM PDT by ak267 (THORIUM....ENERGY OF THE FUTURE!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson