1St, Bengazi is important but it would be almost impossible to call that an impeachable event.
Because lack of judgement, lack of information or inadequate advice from military officers, etc., is not grounds for impeachment and one or all of those would be his plea.
In other words, Bengazi will go down as bad decision making, not treason, even though I personally believe that it was treason.
There is so much more to Benghazi and that is why the administration and assistants want people to shut up about it.
Of course there is, but you are ignoring my point which is that what you know and what you believe does not necessarily mean that it can be sold to a jury.
And that is what impeachment is, as the senate is the jury.
Since the senate is riddled with extreme libs like Harry Reid, Schumer, Durbin, Feinstein etc., the evidence would have to be absolutely incontrovertible.
Mix in bad advice from State, lack of knowledge on the part of his inner circle, attempts at secrecy by some in the CIA (maybe even from obumbler himself), ignorance and lack of backbone on the part of obumbler, and you have a disaster in an impeachment process in a senate controlled by libs.
All of the above would be required to testify in an impeachment based on Bengazi.
That is why the IRS and the NSA things are of more importance AS FAR AS IMPEACHMENT is concerned.
If obumbler, Holder and Napolitano can be impeached, the Bengazi story will be told. Even if obumbler survives the IRS NSA scandal, the others will go and with them gone it is most likely the truth will come out concerning Bengazi and that could then be used against obumbler.
My own opinion is that it is beyond reality to think that obumbler’s henchmen were not bragging out loud to obumbler and everyone else in the inner circle that they were about to get Fox news and the TEA Party. To say that he did not know is to look a fool.
But the bottom line is that a wise man chooses battles he can win. The IRS NSA Fox things can be won.