Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

***Why Did Spielberg Desert Us Half Way***
Stardate: 1306.14

Posted on 06/14/2013 7:54:44 PM PDT by The Wizard

How could a film maker make such a good film as "Young Sherlock Holmes" with a perfect Holmes, (Nicholas Rowe) and Watson, (Alan Cox) who both have diction enough to understand no matter how loud or soft they speak, and a complimentary screen relationship on a par with Rathbone and Bruce.....

and not make the next film we were promised by the end of that movie



TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Miscellaneous; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: movie

1 posted on 06/14/2013 7:54:44 PM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

somebody call Steven and let’s see part two....


2 posted on 06/14/2013 7:55:17 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Are you sure that’s the correct Stardate? :)


3 posted on 06/14/2013 8:01:16 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

A better question is ‘why should anyone care?’


4 posted on 06/14/2013 8:02:20 PM PDT by Bullish (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

I thought young Sherlock Holmes was an unusually good movie tho it did take a few liberties with Conan Doyle. That was probably necessary as he had to make a movie which was technically before Holmes and Watson met.

Still it was a very well done movie. He also did a short run TV show of Young Indiana Jones which I also liked but the public never caught on. I think if it had run longer they would eventually caught on to it.


5 posted on 06/14/2013 8:03:07 PM PDT by yarddog (There Are Three Things That Remain--Faith, Hope, and Love--and,the Greatest of These is Love..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

True. The ending was supposed to lead to a Moriarty-type movie but Alan Cox who played Rathe, did it exceptionally well. Damn endings. It’s like the ending to 1982 The Thing’ and you were wondering if both Kurt Russell and the other dude were either infected or survived.


6 posted on 06/14/2013 8:14:49 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
I don't think it begged for a sequel. It was meant as a hypothetical prequel to the already existing Holmes canon.

That's the way I always viewed it anyways...

7 posted on 06/14/2013 8:18:18 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Fun movie, had hoped for at least one sequel.


8 posted on 06/14/2013 8:25:35 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
IMHO, after Jeremy Brett's Holmes no one ever need make any more movies or series again.
9 posted on 06/14/2013 8:29:55 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

I agree with you tho if Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce had the same stories and writing along with a decent budget, they would have been great

I remember in one episode, Watson and a Woman they are protecting sing “Lock Lomond” together with her on the piano, Nigel Bruce belts out the song so well that Sherlock applauds and says he is worthy of being at the Royal Albert Hall and indeed his singing is outstanding.


10 posted on 06/14/2013 8:37:43 PM PDT by yarddog (There Are Three Things That Remain--Faith, Hope, and Love--and,the Greatest of These is Love..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Good movie. I wouldn’t count on a sequel though considering how long ago the movie came out.


11 posted on 06/14/2013 9:01:52 PM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

The movie stiffed at the boxoffice, so no sequel.


12 posted on 06/14/2013 9:18:35 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

I’ve seen the Rathbone movies so many times, and so enjoyed them each and every time, that any other Sherlock Holmes is inconceivable to me. And yes, even though they were churned out on budget, they still hold up.


13 posted on 06/14/2013 9:32:07 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

If you, like me, need that Holmesian fix, try Youtube links to ‘The Dark Beginnings of Sherlock Holmes’. Good stuff, with a Doctor Bell as Doyle’s teacher in solving murder mysteries.


14 posted on 06/14/2013 11:20:01 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I agree....Basil and Nigel, and Sean Connery, there’s no replacing the “real McCoy


15 posted on 06/15/2013 8:14:19 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson