REGROUP

Blueunicorn6 | 6/15/2013 | blueunicorn6

[GenXteacher]

Obamacare is a bald attempt to destroy private medical insurance so that the only option will be a single-payer national health system funded by the taxpayers; some of the people he has associated with in the past (Bill Ayres, Frank Marshall Davis) were certainly of the radical left; his remark to Joe the Plumber that he wanted to “redistribute the wealth” is certainly indicative of communist intentions; the CPUSA campaigned for him; his support for gun control certainly indicates a contempt for American liberty; and his desire to accomodate the UN is another.

[txhurl]

In a group of sociopaths, who is in control?

---

The anti-sociopath who can earthquake their tenuous control tentacles - the highest up who watches for sociopaths gone wrong?

Sociopaths have no depth, or sense of natural order, but also no sense of political or spiritual creativity. They can’t build things, they can only build on top of things that anti-sociopaths have built - the good things in life.

[txhurl]

Could be. I hadn’t thought of that. How would that benefit the Democrats?

Because homostapo, like rust or evil, never sleeps? Resistance if futile for SRM.

[bigheadfred]

Pathocratic leadership believes that it can achieve a state wherein those “other” people’s minds become dependent by means of the effects of their personality, perfidious pedagogical means, the means of mass-disinformation, and psychological terror; such faith has a basic meaning for them. In their conceptual world, pathocrats consider it virtually self-evident that the “others” should accept their obvious, realistic, and simple way of apprehending reality. For some mysterious reason, though, the “others” wriggle out, slither away, and tell each other jokes about pathocrats. Someone must be responsible for this: pre-revolutionary oldsters, or some radio stations abroad. It thus becomes necessary to improve the methodology of action, find better “soul engineers” with a certain literary talent, and isolate society from improper literature and any foreign influence. Those experiences and intuitions whispering that this is a Sisyphean labor must be repressed from the field of consciousness of the pathocrats. (p. 164)

Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes

[txhurl]

I can out-liberal any liberal in argument and have them starry-eyed at me. I’m evil like that.

But liberals cannot out-conservative any conservative, they don’t understand the landscape.

[bigheadfred]

that is what they get for living in ratholes

[Gene Eric]

>> Let’s get back to the fundamentals with some fresh viewpoints. We’ll start by examining the opposition.

C’mon man, it’s Saturday. Tomorrow’s Father’s day. And I gotta cut the lawn.

[AnonymousConservative]

Without understanding what Liberalism and Conservatism is, this will unavoidably be the same idscussion people always have over this.

Liberalism is a hedonistic psychology akin to the r-Selected Reprodutive Strategy, and designed to emerge spontaneously in our population to exploit resource excess. Conservatism is a more competitive psychology designed to emerge spontaneoulsy under conditions of resource scarcity, and allow one to best survive and reproudce in such a harsh environment. If you understand that, this whole argument changes, becasue ideology suddenly has purpose, and is affected by a very simple environmental variable.

See my site for more.