And what is your evidence for that accusation???
JoPa was complicit by NOT TELLING THE POLICE WHAT HE KNEW INSTANTLY.
And what exactly was it that he knew??? All he knew was the story that Mike McQueary told him -- a story that has changed many times over the years and was not believed by the Sandusky jury.
You sound just like Al Sharpton who loves to leve; serious charges but without evidence. Are you sure you're on the right forum???
And what exactly was it that he knew??? All he knew was the story that Mike McQueary told him — a story that has changed many times over the years and was not believed by the Sandusky jury...
...you apparently believe that in 1999 Paterno, the head coach, was not aware that his then defensive coordinator Sandusky, was being investigated for improper activities with a boy in a shower...the same Paterno who reportedly knew when his players were skipping a Spanish class or two, or that they got a speeding ticket in the summer...
...you are certainly well versed in legal matters, as your posts make evident, and you know baloney when you see it...yet somehow, this impossible supposition of Paterno ignorance escapes you...this is why Joe failed in this matter, because McQueary’s story should have set off the alarms in his head, and the possible damage to his beloved program should have been unbearable to him...but apparently he simply told Curley and washed his hands of the situation...