Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: B4Ranch

True, but it’s not a bad idea. If a gun I once owned was used in a crime & traced back to me, I would produce the receipt, “Nope, sold that one years ago, check it out.”


49 posted on 06/18/2013 10:58:01 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: elcid1970

If you were to only buy from neighbors that would never be an issue because it couldn’t be traced back to you.

_______________________________________________________

Could it, Senator Schumer? I hope you dump your lunch seeing this in print.


51 posted on 06/18/2013 11:04:28 AM PDT by B4Ranch (AGENDA: Grinding America Down ----- http://vimeo.com/63749370)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: elcid1970
elcid1970 said: If a gun I once owned was used in a crime & traced back to me, I would produce the receipt, “Nope, sold that one years ago, check it out.”

In my case, I would say nothing at all and consult an attorney.

You will have no idea just what trouble you might get into by even admitting to having ever owned the weapon in question. You have little to lose and potentially much to gain by refusing to be the source of any evidence whatever.

Have you watched the videos on Youtube explaining why you should NEVER talk to the police?

To summarize the most important point I got from the videos: "Even if you tell the absolute truth, you may come under suspicion if your otherwise irrelevant but truthful statement is mistakenly contradicted by some other trustworthy person whom the police choose to believe ."

If you make no statement at all, there will be no contradiction.

65 posted on 06/18/2013 1:03:37 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson