Skip to comments.
Superman’s battle with Zod cost $2 trillion, killed 129,000 people
The Washington Post ^
| June 21, 2013
| Dylan Matthews
Posted on 06/21/2013 5:50:57 PM PDT by Bratch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: BillyBoy
Oh cooome on! What was so bad about it? I thought it was great, typical roller coaster ride which is what summer movies should be like.
21
posted on
06/21/2013 6:47:43 PM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
The ending went against everything that Superman represents.
22
posted on
06/21/2013 6:53:52 PM PDT
by
RightFighter
(It was all for nothing.)
To: Bratch
Hope they were all Democrats and “sons of Obama”.
However, just look at the battle as a new form of “urban renewal”. Ask Detroit about it.
I like the original Superboy/Man - “Truth, justice and the American way”.
Under Obama, it is “Lies, Injustice and the Marxist way”.
(Or: “Benghazi, IRS/AP/Rosen activities, and Obamacare”)
Any questions?
To: al baby
What do you get when you mix a drunken bigamist with a Communist slut?
24
posted on
06/21/2013 7:21:12 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
25
posted on
06/21/2013 7:22:18 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: al baby
26
posted on
06/21/2013 7:24:11 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: max americana
$2 trillion equals 1 Kryptonian dollar, right? Or two of these babies...
27
posted on
06/21/2013 7:27:42 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: Little Ray
Exactly ...and The Incredibles was one amazingly intelligent movie. As for Man of Steel, very good movie. I am glad they didn’t try to add ‘humor.’
28
posted on
06/21/2013 7:55:15 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: Bratch
The should have used special affects. Filming on site can cause collateral damage.
29
posted on
06/21/2013 8:02:19 PM PDT
by
ThomasThomas
(A bad hair day is not a mental issue, or is it?)
To: Bratch
Something is wrong when adults are giving this amount of attention to a movie about a character with supernatural powers.
30
posted on
06/21/2013 9:24:10 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
To: BillyBoy
LOL. True, but Superman is one of those franchises that has been around since 1933. I’m sure there will be other “remakes,” re-boots, and other incarnations in the future.
31
posted on
06/22/2013 4:18:00 AM PDT
by
hawaiianninja
(Palm note to self: Call 'em a Depression and a Cold Civil War. Pray for America!)
To: hawaiianninja
If Hollywood wants to make another Superman film to cash in on a well known franchise, I don't have a problem with it.
However, If Hollywood wants to lazily recycle ideas and "reimagine" Superman II and give it the Michael Bay treatment, I DO have a problem with it.
Likewise, I don't mind them cashing in on Mario Puzo's name by adapting another one of his mafia novels to the big screen. But if they decided to make THIS, I'd have a big problem:
32
posted on
06/22/2013 12:24:59 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
