Posted on 06/23/2013 6:48:35 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
...On page 35, line 24 of the new bill, a provision was inserted that says Napolitano--who already believes the border is secure--can decide against building a fence if she chooses not to erect one:...
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
As in, complete annulment of the fence?
That is again, a potential complete annulment of the fence.
Defeat this bill.
Damn, it surely is time for a REVOLUTION if that is truely the case.
NSA be Damned—come get my ass!!!
“Napolitano—who already believes the border is secure—can decide against building a fence if she chooses not to erect one:”
Which would be decided against in about 10 seconds after the bill is passed.
Which would be decided against in about 10 seconds after the bill is passed.
The only reason it would take her as long as 10 seconds is her nurons have a problem working in all that lard.
“Napolitano—who already believes the border is secure—can decide against building a fence if she chooses not to erect one:”
Why will we need a fence after this travesty becomes law?
The Mexicans are already citizens of Mexico..this will give them US citizenship..DUAL citizenship..they can come and go as they please..the fence discussion will become moot..that is her plan..bet on it.
Bump.
I’m really, really getting tired of being played.
If we have to make a deal to seal the border, then let’s make a deal.
What this sounds like is we make a deal, then Dems once again move the goalposts.
NO DEAL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.