Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KosmicKitty

If you’re going to kill someone for political reasons, I’d think you’d want it to be quite and deniable. You’d inject him with flu and pneumonia. You’d create a gas leak in his house and spark it with an old appliance. At the very least you’d do the old hit and run. You don’t do something spectacular. If you do, then you’re sending all sorts of messages. In Russia, a high value industrialist was killed with radioactive cesium in his telephone head set. Now, how many people can obtain or safely handle radioactive cesium? Only somebody government connected. So, that not only killed the guy, but sent a valuable message to others who might be inclined to not tow the line.

Who would “they” want to send a message to? Other journalists? What, there’s somebody threatening to publish Obama’s hidden records? Other journalists would kill them first.


27 posted on 06/25/2013 2:02:18 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather

Maybe Hastings got Breitbarted.


29 posted on 06/25/2013 2:05:25 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Gen.Blather
...you don’t knock down a conspiracy theory until you can prove it [wrong]...

When starting with the assumption that conspiracy theories are true until proven otherwise, there is no more argument.

Meanwhile, the rest of reality demands extraordinary proof for extraordinary claims.

37 posted on 06/25/2013 2:19:36 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson