Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy’s Next Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named Enterprise
U. S. Department of Defense ^ | December 1, 2012 | Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense - Public Affairs

Posted on 07/10/2013 4:49:13 PM PDT by re_tail20

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus announced today via video message at the USS Enterprise (CVN 65) inactivation ceremony that the third Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier will be named Enterprise.

Mabus selected this name to honor USS Enterprise (CVN 65), the Navy’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which was inactivated today in Norfolk, Va. Commissioned in 1961, CVN 65 served for more than five decades. It participated in the blockade of the Cuban Missile Crisis, launched strike operations in Vietnam, and conducted combat missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

“The USS Enterprise was the first of its kind, and for 51 years its name has been synonymous with boldness, readiness and an adventurous spirit,” said Mabus. “Rarely has our fleet been without a ship bearing the name. I chose to maintain this tradition not solely because of the legacy it invokes, but because the remarkable work of the name Enterprise is not done.”

The future USS Enterprise, designated CVN 80, will be the ninth ship to bear the name.

USS Enterprise and subsequent Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers will provide improved warfighting capability, quality of life improvements for Sailors and reduced life cycle costs.

The Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier will be 1,092 feet in length and have a beam of 134 feet. The flight deck will be 256 feet wide, and the ship will be able to operate at speeds in excess of 34 knots. Enterprise will be built by Huntington Ingalls Industries-Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Va.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: navyenterprise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: GreyFriar

I think Hornet’s Nest would be more appropriate.


41 posted on 07/10/2013 6:47:30 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: re_tail20

We don’t need any more of these big ships. They were great in their day but we need a new paradigm for projecting power.


42 posted on 07/10/2013 6:54:38 PM PDT by HChampagne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

The Enterprise has been with us since the beginning - she needs to stay with us - it’s our history and if we are to remain a country - ships such as her need to be ready - and for the sailors that fought so hard and the pilots that launched from her decks later on...she’s a mainstay in the US Navy....and this is coming from a Army guy!


43 posted on 07/11/2013 5:20:51 AM PDT by BCW (Book - http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I believe there are a few exceptions:


44 posted on 07/11/2013 9:08:34 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
Yes, it is traditional to name destroyers, frigates, etc after MOH winners, etc. But those aren't capital ships.
45 posted on 07/11/2013 9:54:51 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson