I googled "Kahre's Law of Diminishing Information" and that was the fourth hit. The first three didn't really do any more than state the law, which you had already done, so they didn't provide any context.
Of course, this "Hungarian scientist with the charming name" is "my friend the astrophysicist."
Really? Cool! You know, that even occurred to me while I was reading his paper. I don't know, I guess the paper just sounded like some of his quotes that you've posted or something.
So, what was the date of the paper you are quoting here? If he has recently gone into "chemoton mode," it would be news to me.
It says "Received: 15 September, 2005. Accepted: 15 October, 2005." (I gave the link in my earlier post, if you want to download it.) It'd be interesting to know what he meant when he wrote, "We think that chemoton theory is basic and will remain fundamental even when we turn our attention to a complementary aspect relative to chemical evolution: to the quantitative understanding of the origin of genetic information." [emphasis added]
Oh really? Well, that must just mean that I have learned a thing or two from him over the course of many years of association.
Why don't we just cut to the chase and ask him what he means by "chemoton theory," and how it dovetails with "the quantitative understanding of the origin of genetic information?"
I just sent him an e-mail. I'll get back to you on this question when I have a reply.