Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controversial JFK Documentary Theory: President Was Killed by Accidental Secret Service Shot
yahoo.com ^ | July 30, 2013 | Kimberly Potts |

Posted on 07/30/2013 10:20:03 PM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last
To: Netz
"Well, I can see that you're coming from a completely different school of thought. I am not with you on this one and unfortunately, because so many of us differ in our views, we won't get to the truth until ~2037 if, at all."

I'm coming from the school where you look at the actual evidence and not the stories that conspiracy books tell you about the evidence. What is supposed to happen in 2037? Releasing documents? Aren't you aware that this already happened?

Ultimate Sacrifice is just another conspiracy book like 1,000 others. It gets a lot of stuff wrong and builds an argument on shaky and incorrect facts.

121 posted on 08/01/2013 10:25:45 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
What is a long time? Couldn’t have been too long, because his body was back in DC by midnight.

It seemed like eternity to Kennedy.

122 posted on 08/01/2013 10:29:42 AM PDT by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Any mention of Keith Hernandez’ involvement?

h/t Newman!


123 posted on 08/01/2013 10:36:16 AM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
The "magic loogey" holds the answers...


124 posted on 08/01/2013 10:45:20 AM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mlo

It was at the top back of the head consistent with the knoll kill shot. I am not debating with a person that lies a d says Jackie was not scrambling for his brains. Those are facts that are known and I think you are a mole or something. Take care.


125 posted on 08/01/2013 12:11:18 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: fabian
"It was at the top back of the head consistent with the knoll kill shot. I am not debating with a person that lies a d says Jackie was not scrambling for his brains. Those are facts that are known and I think you are a mole or something. Take care."

Something doesn't become a fact just because it's your opinion. No, it's not a known fact that Jackie was chasing brains.

You aren't debating, that's true. You just make assertions about your own opinions. Do you realize that a shot from the knoll at the time of the head shot would NOT be to the front? It would be to the right side of the President, and the bullet would have to exit the other side of head and hit Jackie? No, I didn't think so. Conspiracy books don't like to point that out.


126 posted on 08/01/2013 12:29:58 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: mlo

You are being dishonest again. The front side of the head is consistent with a second shooter, not Oswald. You are full of bahloney and somehow your are so lacking it commonsense or you were deliberately paid or planted here to argue the ridiculous. Either way I sort of fell sorry for you. I have been debating, so stop your bs. Thanks a d have a good one!


127 posted on 08/01/2013 12:42:26 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: fabian

You’re not much into backing up your statements with evidence, i.e., photos, statements, etc., are you?


128 posted on 08/01/2013 1:30:45 PM PDT by Benito Cereno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Benito Cereno

Been really busy...this is really old and know stuff that is easily found all over the internet. It is a no brained if ever there was a conspiracy. What is amazing is how some people can hold steadfast to the bs about it all. I see that even some conservative are very easy to brainwash.


129 posted on 08/01/2013 3:12:10 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Benito Cereno

Here you go...at 4 minutes into this video is the evidence for a front/side head shot and all of the hospital witnesses said there was a blown out back of the skull. Sure, some changed there testimony later...for obvious reasons! They knew full well what they saw in our former president. THe evidence is plain to see and anyone who denies it is just being willfully ignorant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JEmhMkKuIA


130 posted on 08/01/2013 8:51:17 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: fabian
"You are being dishonest again. The front side of the head is consistent with a second shooter, not Oswald. You are full of bahloney and somehow your are so lacking it commonsense or you were deliberately paid or planted here to argue the ridiculous. Either way I sort of fell sorry for you. I have been debating, so stop your bs. Thanks a d have a good one!"

Yada yada yada. Post something that proves your point and stop ranting.

131 posted on 08/01/2013 9:26:32 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: fabian

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/head.htm


132 posted on 08/01/2013 9:31:28 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“Bugliosi’s book “Reclaiming History” discusses this at length and completely demolishes the stupid claim that Oswald could have never got off that many shots from that type of rifle, much less hit anything”

Another marvelous demonstration of this is the computer program “JFK Reloaded”. Find it if you can. It’s a “first person shooter” game, with you as Oswald and the simulation remarkably accurate, right down to projectile deflection thru internal organs. Getting off those shots with that accuracy is not remarkable, and this “game” lets you experience it first hand without the harm.


133 posted on 08/01/2013 9:46:59 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mlo

proof...only the willfully blind can deny it...facts, period.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JEmhMkKuIA


134 posted on 08/01/2013 9:51:23 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Bugliosi? Omg...the man is nutty as a fruitcake. He also wrote a book trying to disprove the existence of God. I think the spirit of Manson got inside him, unrecognized and changed him badly.


135 posted on 08/01/2013 9:53:16 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: fabian

Nonetheless, those shots at that distance are nowhere near as hard as many contend. Facts are facts, even when recounted by idiots.


136 posted on 08/01/2013 10:04:56 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mlo

All documents have been revealed? All?


137 posted on 08/01/2013 11:47:44 PM PDT by Netz (Netz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Wow. I had never heard of that...sounds like an interesting exercise.

I had another Freeper imply that I was simply swallowing everything Bugliosi said in his book without discrimination. Nothing of the sort.

Bugliosi simply takes the available, many times incontrovertible, and exhaustive evidence and shows how if it had not been a charged political situation, it would have been a case that any jury of the day would have spent a minuscule amount of time considering before coming back with a unanimous verdict of guilty.

He does it with logic and facts.


138 posted on 08/02/2013 4:16:16 AM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson