Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health care costsare going up 72% (IN)
Kokomo Tribune ^ | July 31, 2013 | Stephen W. Robertson

Posted on 07/31/2013 8:16:45 AM PDT by digger48

When Indiana recently announced that individual health insurance costs in Indiana will rise 72 percent on average because of new Affordable Care Act requirements, an immediate outcry followed from some ACA supporters, who accused the Department of Insurance of misrepresenting these numbers in a deliberate attempt to mislead Hoosiers. The DOI provided a lengthy testimony about these numbers before the Indiana Health Finance Commission on July 22, and the DOI stands by its numbers. The fact remains that the Indiana individual health insurance market will see significant increases next year because of ACA.

The following is some background about how we arrived and compared our cost-increase number. First, we began with the average “per member per month” cost for 2012, which is based on actual filings submitted to the DOI by Indiana health insurance companies. We then compared this number to average “per member per month” cost for 2014 filings. After subtracting normally expected cost increases or “trend” costs, we arrived at a 72 percent average cost increase for 2014. This is the increase amount in insurance costs directly attributable to the ACA.

Some media outlets have highlighted costs for the absolute cheapest health plans available in Indiana in 2014 without any comparison to costs for similar plans prior to the ACA to portray the appearance of “affordability.” In fact, many “bronze” and “silver” plans will likely receive the sharpest percentage increases compared to similar health plans before ACA because younger and healthier Hoosiers will bear more of the cost shifting from senior and sicker Hoosiers. These younger and healthier Hoosiers are more likely to choose “bronze” and “silver” plans.

It is also important to note that these cost increases will occur regardless of who is actually paying the final bill. We acknowledge that many Hoosiers in the individual market will qualify for tax subsidies to purchase insurance in the federally run marketplace. The cost of these subsidies is not free, even to those that receive them. They will be paid in full by federal taxpayers.

ACA proponents have attacked the DOI for not including federal subsidies in our insurance cost projections, which would paint a prettier, yet unrealistic, picture of the law’s costs in Indiana. This is merely an attempt to distract Hoosiers from the actual insurance costs. The regrettable fact is that health insurance costs are going up because of the ACA.

Stephen W. Robertson

Insurance commissionerof Insurance


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: incometax; indiana; obamacare; obamarecession; obamataxhikes
Insurance commissionerof Insurance

Someones typo.

Should read...

Commissioner of Insurance
State of Indiana

1 posted on 07/31/2013 8:16:45 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: digger48

If you like your doctor, you’ll get to join him as you both enter the poorhouse.


2 posted on 07/31/2013 8:19:42 AM PDT by relictele (A community vigilant in enforcing economic, racial and social equality. It was called Jonestown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

“ACA Supporters” live in a world of make believe.

When my liberal sister in law gets confronted with direct fact and common sense on why she’s wrong about healthcare or whatever, she simply says “oh, you must be mislead by that right wing Beck again”. It gets dismissed. Same with all liberals.


3 posted on 07/31/2013 8:23:47 AM PDT by albie (re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

“When my liberal sister in law gets confronted with direct fact and common sense on why she’s wrong about healthcare or whatever, she simply says “oh, you must be mislead by that right wing Beck again”. It gets dismissed. Same with all liberals.”

It never occurs to the dumb@sses (and yes, I’m including my own “in-laws” in that)....that they are the ones being “mislead” (lied to).


4 posted on 07/31/2013 8:35:37 AM PDT by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: digger48
The latest numbers suggest that 1/6th of the economy is devoted to health care.

If the average citizen is not spending 1/6th of his income on health care, then the slack is being taken up by either taxes or deficit spending.

5 posted on 07/31/2013 8:48:12 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

I’m spending about 20% of my wages on my BC/BS.

That’s before taxes.

I don’t know that I can keep that policy if it goes up another 25%.

At that point, I would have more disposable income left if I were on Disability and Medicaid


6 posted on 07/31/2013 8:52:50 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: digger48
They don't charge or tax the young (nor most of the elderly), so I guess that means that those who pay to keep the medical sector afloat probably need to charge the rest of us closer to 30%.

If you add the cost of your policy to your Medicare taxes, and that % of your income tax devoted to the HHS, then you're probably paying your "fair" share.

7 posted on 07/31/2013 2:18:20 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson