Replies

And here’s what Michelle Malkin’s page had to say about the SF ‘accident’ as you called it.

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/08/29/san-fran-car-rampage-ends-at/

It would seem that the perp had ‘just returned from a trip to Afghanistan’ (which seems to always be a prelude to terror activities, the Boston bombers had spent 6m in Chechnya/Dagestan prior to their return to beantown) and was suffering ‘jitters’. Except if you read the descriptions of witnesses and victims he doesn’t seem to have been ‘jittery’ at all. More like calm, cool, collected and determined.

There have been more than a few of these type of incidents. Rapidly covered up by the MSM and buried deeeeeep in the muck. If I WERE obsessed by the idea I’d have a list of them. I don’t have a list. I remember the SF and NC cases in particular because as it happens disparate friends of mine were actual witnesses to BOTH events.

And ‘accidentally’ hitting many people in many DIFFERENT locations is hardly the old fashioned idea of ‘hit and run’ where the drunk or texter-addict just simply loses concentration and runs over some kid on a bike.

So if the MSM is lying about the SF case being an ‘accident’ it stands to reason they’re being deliberately obtuse about others as well.

Trust them at your peril. Given their past performance we have a right to be suspicious of this kid. Likely he’s just PDC (pretty damned crazy). But we thought that about James Holmes too. Turns out he was also a convert. It’s fairly common in this particular age demographic for reasons I stated earlier.