*************************************EXCERPT***************************************
Edim says:
I disagree that weve seen the double peak, and it will be downhill after this. Therell be more peaks and the downhill will start after ~2014/15, but the strong monthly peak in late 2011 may remain the maximum monthly ssn for this long cycle.
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/bfly.gif
*******************************EXCERPT*******************************************
Kev-in-Uk says:
But according to sources, the solar changes will have little to no effect on the earths climate?
I mean TSI only varies by a mere smidgen (+/- 0.1%), right?
and of course, the rising CO2 levels will keep us nice and warm anyway?
On a more sobering note:
I was wondering if a definitively weak solar cycle does actually lead to significant (i.e. measurable)surface temperature changes, exactly how the MSM and super solar scientists will explain it away?
On the one hand, it would be a good experiment with the chance to see how such solar changes affect temperatures, especially the timelag between cause and effect and perhaps thus confirm/refute the constant solar claims (pun intended). On the other hand, a long time lag will simply play into the alarmists and politicos hands and all the while those in fuel poverty will be freezing their proverbial butts off.