Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Pro-Choice” Women Angry About Not Being Told Abortion Drug Has Big Risks
Life News ^ | Randy O'Bannon Ph.D.

Posted on 09/17/2013 9:06:04 AM PDT by Morgana

There have been a rash of articles in media of late pushing the line that informed consent laws, laws limiting chemical abortions, and challenges to so-called “web-cam abortions” are totally unnecessary, just pro-life ploys to put more obstacles in the way of women getting the “reproductive health care” they want and need.

They say that chemical abortions are safe, rather simple, sort of like a “heavy period,” that women get all the medical attention they need, that they are glad to be able to abort in the privacy of their own homes.

Try telling that to “Kay,” a married, “pro-choice” doctoral student in her late twenties who went through a horrific chemical abortion earlier this year courtesy of her area Planned Parenthood.

Kay’s story is featured on, the website founded and maintained by Monty Patterson. Since losing his daughter Holly to an infection connected with her chemical abortion in 2003, Mr. Patterson has devoted much of the last ten years to collecting and publicizing medical data and personal stories about RU-486 abortions

(RU-486 abortions employ at least two drugs. Mifepristone shuts down the unborn baby’s life support system, and misoprostol, a prostaglandin, which initiates powerful uterine contractions to expel the emaciated corpse.)

September 17th marks the 10th anniversary of Holly Patterson’s death.

Kay survived her chemical abortion, but said, “The whole ordeal was awful.” She described a nightmare from the moment she showed up at Planned Parenthood through the next several weeks.

Arriving at her appointment, Planned Parenthood made her husband stay in the waiting room while they brought her back for what Kay described as “an invasive trans-vaginal ultrasound that took nearly 45 minutes.” Yes, that would be the same “invasive” trans-vaginal ultrasound that allies of Planned Parenthood have likened to rape in other contexts. As we have noted on many occasions (and verified by Kay’s account), the use of such ultrasounds appears to be standard procedure at Planned Parenthood.

She was then directed to watch a video on the abortion pill which, according to Kay, “described the process very superficially” and compared it a “heavy period.”

Kay had questions she wanted to ask the abortionist, but he had little time for her.

“In less than two minutes the physician covered the four medicines he was giving me [the abortifacient mifepristone, the prostaglandin misoprostol to induce contractions, plus drugs for pain and nausea]…, the procedure, and what I ought to expect.”

When he finished and she began to ask questions, “he handed me a one-page printout with drawn diagrams and said, ‘This will cover everything you need to know’.” When Kay pressed him, the doctor told her

“Don’t be so anal about this. The hardest part, getting here, is over. Just follow the directions on the printout. All the information you need is there.”

When Kay pointed out that one instruction he had given her personally — not to take anything with aspirin, which is a blood thinner — was not on the page he handed her, the abortionist told her, “If you have any problems call the number on the handout and don’t put anything in you vagina – fingers, crayons, etc. – for three weeks.”

Kay notes “That was the end of our ‘consultation.’” It lasted ten minutes.

She took the RU-486 there in the office and took the other pills home in a brown paper bag.

She took the prostaglandin misoprostol two days later, “follow[ing] the directions exactly,” and sat in a warm bath, waiting for the drugs to take effect.

Within 15 minutes of the pills dissolving, she felt heavy pressure in her lower abdomen and “uncontrollable cramping.” She felt so much pain she says she nearly fainted.

She was in such pain, she called her husband and says she “told him I was dying.” In her words, the pain was “unimaginable,” “Indescribable,” “the worst pain I have ever felt.” Kay says “With every cramp I felt my heart race and my blood pressure plummet.” She says she felt “nauseated, dizzy and lightheaded.”

By the time her husband got home, “the water in the tub was colored red by blood and our dog was barking like mad in-between my screams.”

When her husband called the emergency number given them by the clinic and described the situation, the people on the other end of the phone labeled this “normal” and said she did not need to go to the hospital.

They suggested she take some more pain pills if she was “uncomfortable,”

Kay said. It was also then that they told her husband that she should not be in the tub because an infection could enter the uterus [such infections killed Holly Patterson and at least seven other chemical abortion patients]. This instruction, Kay noted, was yet one more not on the information sheet she’d received.

Her husband got her out of the tub, and into the bed. She took more pain pills, totaling four hydrocodones in less than an hour and a half, but these “barely cut the pain.” Kay says, “I faded in and out, shivering and sweating.”

It was then, with her husband lying next to her, that Kay says, “I went through the worst experience of my life.”

“After two hours of this,” Kay says, “I felt a rush of blood and a large lemon-sized clot came out. I assume that was the pregnancy. I was horrified. Why hadn’t anyone told me that it would be like this?”

Her husband cleaned the blood off her, cleaned up the towels, changed the sheets, dressed her because she was too weak from the pain. She took two more pain pills and finally slept.

A follow-up trans-vaginal ultrasound at three weeks confirmed that the abortion had occurred and that there were no signs of infection.

But the process was far from over.


Kay says “I still bled for the next five weeks. Sometimes it would just be spotting, but at other times there would be gushes of blood.”

She mentions one particular afternoon, a month or so later, when she was getting out of the car and felt a gush. She thought she had simply had a sudden loss of bladder control, but when she stood up, she found the seat of the car “was covered in blood.”

“There was blood everywhere – on the seat, on the floor of the car, on the back of my skirt, down my legs (and completely soaked through the mega-pad that Planned Parenthood had recommended.”

When her husband called the emergency number again, he was again informed that this was “normal.” And once again, he was told that she didn’t need to go to the hospital – unless this was happening continuously.

There were other occasions when she bled through her pad and her pants during meetings. “Embarrassed,” Kay says, “I spent most of my time depressed and hiding at home.”

One should keep in mind that, to Planned Parenthood, Kay’s experience was “normal.” As far as they are concerned, she experienced no reportable complication and is likely to be counted as one more successful chemical abortion.”

Kay, though, saw her ordeal as “awful,” as “traumatic.” She was not happy with Planned Parenthood or the way they treated her.

“I was angry that I hadn’t been sufficiently told or warned about the potential dangers and side effects of the medical [chemical] abortion.”

She told this to a friend who suggested that “Planned Parenthood probably didn’t want to ‘scare me away from having an abortion.’”

Kay, unrepentant about her abortion and still “pro-choice” to the core, still says efforts to “help women make the difficult choice to end their pregnancy” should not “come at the expense of fully informing them.” If she had been given all the information, Kay says she would have opted for the surgical procedure.

Kay says, “I cannot imagine what it would have been like to be a teenager or even a young woman going through that experience.” She had her husband with her, but says “What I keep thinking about is, ‘What if I had been alone?’”

The trouble is, of course, that many women, including many teenagers, do go through these traumatic abortions all alone. Some, in places where Planned Parenthood does webcam abortions, never even spend time in the same room as a doctor, much less even ten minutes.

And all a woman gets with her pills is a handout with limited information and maybe a scrap of paper with a phone number on it to call in an emergency. Note that turning a bath tub red with her blood or bleeding all over her car apparently does not qualify!

The new chemical abortion methods aren’t safer, aren’t easier, and they certainly aren’t almost painless. And the only reason women might think otherwise is because someone hasn’t shared the whole truth with them, the truth about what these abortions are like and what they do to women and to their unborn children.

And as result, those women have been exploited, traumatized, and injured.

That’s why these laws are needed.

Even a “pro-choicer” like Kay will tell you that women are not being given the whole story.

TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: abortion; prochoice; prolife; ru486

1 posted on 09/17/2013 9:06:04 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Lies by omission are lies.

“Would a liberal ever LIE to you?” < /sarc >

2 posted on 09/17/2013 9:07:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Pro-choice women angry. Period. Could have stopped right there.

Plus, since when do they need to be told anything? They are the ones engaged in all the lecturing and telling.

3 posted on 09/17/2013 9:08:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I’m thinking that the vehement pro-aborts are actually angry about the abortion pill,
because it allows abortions to occur “quietly”,
instead of “in your face”.

4 posted on 09/17/2013 9:10:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Liberals can’t be told anything anyway, they think they know everything.

5 posted on 09/17/2013 9:10:55 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

You may have a point. Maybe ‘doing it quietly’, as you put it, leaves them alone with only their conscience, and no one to tell them it’s okay; to give them an ‘out’.

In fact I think you may have hit the nail right on the head.

6 posted on 09/17/2013 9:16:12 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

You think it’s hard on the woman, It’s a real bitch for the kid!!

7 posted on 09/17/2013 9:16:24 AM PDT by woodenickel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

She should call Wendy Davis...

8 posted on 09/17/2013 9:17:37 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Howdy to all you government agents spying on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
I'm not a doctor but I can easily see how something that can eject a growing baby could cause a whole lot of serious damage on the delicate female reproduction system.
It amazes me how the same people who are so concerned about "chemicals" in food, water and air could be so lackadaisical about abortion pills, smoking, drugs and junk food.

9 posted on 09/17/2013 9:18:30 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Down to Brass Tacks - abortion is but one of the acts of shaking their fists in the face of God.

Without a “mob mentality” to support their rebellion,
it becomes, as you said, just between them and God. A very uncomfortable place to be in.

10 posted on 09/17/2013 9:21:34 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Kay, unrepentant about her abortion and still “pro-choice” to the core....

You know, when I read this statement after reading that gruesome detail, I can really only muster up so much pity for Kay.

She'll do it again.

Maybe she won't be so lucky to survive herself next time, and then she and her aborted baby can sit down together somewhere on the other side of life and she can explain why she did them in in this way.


11 posted on 09/17/2013 9:32:28 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodenickel
You think it’s hard on the woman, It’s a real bitch for the kid!!

You have put very succinctly what I was thinking while reading the story. I just couldn't conjure up any sympathy for someone complaining about the side-effects of having murdered her innocent child. What was her lesson learned? Use a knife next time.

12 posted on 09/17/2013 9:33:51 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Poor "Kay" is only angry that she couldn't have murdered her unborn child easier, and without so much personal discomfort and inconvenience.

She wanted to off the kid and be back at work in a few days - and she expected that this is what her "sisters" at the abortion factory was offering.

I have no sympathy for poor, stupid "Kay" or her ilk.

13 posted on 09/17/2013 9:44:34 AM PDT by airborne (MY HEROES DON'T WEAR CAPES. MY HEROES WEAR DOG TAGS ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

bs...plenty of info on the risks...supposed to be used under doctor supervision

14 posted on 09/17/2013 9:49:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

::sniff sniff::

The pill would work just fine if you held it between your knees and left out the sex part.

15 posted on 09/17/2013 9:54:39 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

86 is editorial sorthand for “KILL” the story. So R U 4 86 is not ironic put purposeful.

16 posted on 09/17/2013 10:03:28 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
How Cells from an Aborted Fetus are Used to Create Novel Flavor Enhancers

Comprehensive List Of Companies That Use Aborted Fetal Cells As Flavour

17 posted on 09/17/2013 10:19:14 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

What, they’re OK with murdering their children only if they can do so “safely”?

18 posted on 09/17/2013 10:28:23 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
-- What, they're OK with murdering their children only if they can do so "safely"? --

The complaining pro-abortion chick who composed this screed expressed exactly that. She wrote that she'd have had the more conventional mechanical abortion if she had been told how uncomfortable the chemical process would be, for her.

Absolutely no concern for the life she is taking. And I'm sure she'd angrily tell you why there is no moral wrong to willful termination of the human life she's decided is too troublesome, if you saw fit to challenge her.

19 posted on 09/17/2013 11:35:22 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

In similar news, unborn children angry over pro-choice “mothers”.

20 posted on 09/19/2013 2:34:44 PM PDT by Clump ( the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson