Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Is Why Most Military Personnel Aren’t Armed on Military Bases — and It’s Not Clinton’s Fault
The Blaze ^ | Sept 17, 2013 | Oliver Darcy

Posted on 09/17/2013 3:03:33 PM PDT by Lucky9teen

Edited on 09/17/2013 3:59:49 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Lucky9teen

Here`s how they do it in Pakistan.

They got nuts n` terrorists there, we got `em here-

WHAT`S THE DIFFERENCE??!!

21 posted on 09/17/2013 3:45:32 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washi
Or allow concealed/open carry of privately owned firearms.

The military largely has its own rules to be followed on military bases. I doubt they would honor carry permits issued by civilian authorities and doubt they should.

Any increased security and carry permits on base should stay under the jurisdiction of the military.

22 posted on 09/17/2013 3:47:48 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

That was SAC.

Old SAC.

Real SAC.

Curt LeMay SAC.

Times have changed.


23 posted on 09/17/2013 3:49:36 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

When I was in OCS, we trained on 45s....
Why? Just for fun? Cripes, train ‘em, let ‘em use ‘em.....


24 posted on 09/17/2013 3:51:11 PM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
“gun-free zone” type policy can actually be traced back to Department of Defense (DoD) Directive signed into effect in February 1992 by Donald J. Atwood, deputy secretary of defense under President George H.W.

Oh the Bush dynasty??

Could you post this in the "Day in the Life" thread?

The fans, or fanatics, will really appreciate it...

Be sure to describe the clothing he and Ms. Bush were wearing at the time, and post some attractive pics along with it.

Thanks!!!

25 posted on 09/17/2013 3:51:25 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
It's an old custom in most military organizations to keep the weapons in an armory, and only issue them when a battle is anticipated.

Bingo. Traditionally, soldiers were "the scum of the earth, enlisted for drink." And sailors were no better.

Officers were always a great deal more concerned about their own soldiers or seamen staging a mutiny than they were about somebody shooting up the base or ship. So access to weapons and ammunition was always tightly controlled. This is the actual origin of Marines, soldiers kept on board and at odds with the sailors. The Marines were armed to keep the sailors under control.

Of course, in the old days muzzle loading firearms made it very difficult for one person or a small group to shoot a bunch of people.

26 posted on 09/17/2013 3:54:24 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I went to Ft. Knox for basic in 1960, and no one had ammunition.

BS

27 posted on 09/17/2013 3:54:45 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
Army regulation 190-14 actually implements a policy put in under George H.W. Bush, meaning Bill Clinton is not responsible for a lack of armed personnel on military bases.

This is only meaningful it this policy was a significant change from the previous policy, which is unlikely. More likely just a restatement.

Until somebody posts something showing that previous policy allowed or required soldiers to be armed on base.

28 posted on 09/17/2013 3:56:28 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Somebody should ask what happened to all the MPs that were relied upon after these orders to disarm the soldiers were issued. They’re not there because they’re in Afghanistan, teaching Afghans how to shoot our MPs in the back.


29 posted on 09/17/2013 4:01:21 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88; Travis McGee

I went through USN gunnery and missle school at Great Lakes from 86-88. Also located on base was Nuclear Propulsion school...and Fire controlman school for the Aegis. All had full scale working models of the equipment being learned about.

I walked many a “Balls to Four”perimeter watch armed with a loaded 1911(Many infantry had already changed to the Beretta). One had to qualify for this at the range and had to take classes on use of deadly force. But, there was no mistake if I had encountered a strange person who did not heed my order to halt...I would of shot them dead.


30 posted on 09/17/2013 4:02:28 PM PDT by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Yes and those armed airmen on SAC bases were authorized security police, both law enforcement, guards and SAT teams. They were protecting the nukes. Whenever I was on duty as a missile officer I was armed. Whenever I flew on the SAC Looking Glass, I was armed. Whenever I transported nuclear release codes or two person control materials I was armed. This is not the same as letting everyone walk about with issued armed weapons.

As an enlisted Marine before that we never had loaded field weapons day to day. Those were maintained in the armory and ammunition was issued at the ranges or as required. Troops stopped carrying their issued weapons with them, even when moving to a new base, sometime back in the early-mid 50s and even then and during WWII they were not issued ammunition unless they were on guard duty or in a combat zone. Living in the barracks, there is not a good way to control stupid individuals and/or drunken individuals. There were incidents where trained personnel accidently or on purpose shot themselves or each other in garrison. We had two guys whom I knew who were MPs, bored in the middle of the night at one of the gates and they decided to play quick draw with their M1911s. On about the 5th quick draw one guy was puzzled that it sounded like a gunshot while his partner was standing there holding his side shouting “You shot me you stupid M*$ke&t%@+er”. We disarmed another drunk Marine who brought a weapon into the club to take care of the guy who supposedly stole his girlfriend. That is why everyone on base is not issued a weapon and ammunition for daily carry/use.


31 posted on 09/17/2013 4:02:58 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Officers should always have loaded sidearms...for authority.

The French NCOs and officers couldn't believe that the pistols that ours carried were unloaded, and said that it was no wonder we had problems with control like we did during the race troubles of the late 1960s and the 1970s.

32 posted on 09/17/2013 4:05:32 PM PDT by ansel12 ( 'I'm on That New Obama Diet... Every Day I Let Vladimir Putin Eat My Lunch' .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Yep, you too compadre.


33 posted on 09/17/2013 4:06:32 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vigilantcitizen

I’m sure that personnel actually standing perimeter watches at any sensitive installation and military police are armed and trained in the use of arms.

But some here are talking about people carrying weapons on base who have civilian issued carry permits, and some even are saying all personnel should carry their weapons on base.

I was in the USNR and served at Little Creek and was often at the main base in Norfolk and never saw anyone armed but military police, and maybe gate guards. I ‘stood’ watches in a building onshore and I don’t think my command even had any weapons. I sure never saw nor heard about any.

The idea that there has been a time in recent memory where large numbers of military personnel walked around on base carrying a weapon and live ammo is nonsense. I agree there should be increased security, but it should come from trained personnel and any carry permits should be issued by the military, and civilian carry permits should not be honored on base.


34 posted on 09/17/2013 4:15:00 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Not true in the least. Are you not familiar with the venerable blunderbuss? Or portable pintle-mounted “swivel guns” that fired a pound of lead balls like a reloadable Claymore?

And that was in an era when relative to the available medical care, a wound—any wound—was far more deadly. Any lunatic could have mowed down the church picnic in 1680 with a blunderbuss. They didn’t. What changed was not firearms, but culture.


35 posted on 09/17/2013 4:15:30 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

36 posted on 09/17/2013 4:24:36 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Will88

My son was in the Navy, and he said they had Marines on board ships with guns cause no one trusted a sailor with one


37 posted on 09/17/2013 4:42:14 PM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Really?? You were there and know better.

The only time we got ammunition was at the firing range, The weapons were locked in storage each night and gotten out in the morning, No one had ammunition for them.


38 posted on 09/17/2013 4:45:17 PM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Not enough?

Bush's homeland security boss Chertoff, was found to have people who entered the country illegally, wandering around the inside of his private residence....During war time.

39 posted on 09/17/2013 4:45:27 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dan(9698)

On guard duty at the Missile base we had 14 rounds and an M-1 Carbine. We passed the ammunition to the guy that relieved us.


40 posted on 09/17/2013 4:46:41 PM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson