To: Former MSM Viewer
I admire Ted Cruz and I don’t even 100% support him on this, because we need to construct our own opposing plan before we really have an opposition.
But the guy can fight.
I am sure glad he’s on our side. Go Cruz!
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I admire Ted Cruz and I dont even 100% support him on this, because we need to construct our own opposing plan before we really have an opposition.
Why do we need a plan? If we just got the government out of it a lot of the problems would go away. I think the best law the government could pass on this would be as follows:
It is illegal to attach your health care insurance to your occupational compensation. Everybody would have to buy it like most people buy car insurance.
When the person paying for a product is also the person using it, the price is automatically kept in check in a “supply and demand” sort of way.
Tort reform wouldn’t hurt either.
8 posted on
09/25/2013 6:01:58 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
we need to construct our own opposing plan before we really have an opposition.
I do believe many opposing plans were offered up during the initial Obamacare fight and were each rejected by the Democrats who were bound and determined to give us a healthcare bill that would fail as designed in order to bring about single payer.
10 posted on
09/25/2013 6:02:36 AM PDT by
Eagle of Liberty
(Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
We DON'T need a plan. Federal involvment in health care is unconsititutional. Only a liberal that trashes the Constitution wants the federal government involved in health care.
/johnny
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson