Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

chamberlain was put in a situation where he knew dern well that england could not stop germany from taking czech-via. the only thing chamberlain could do was buy time for england’s rearmament program to reap results before going to war with germany.

maybe he got a bad rap, but i don’t think it was becaause of personal gullibility - he knew that britian could not force germany out without a war there was no chance of winning.


45 posted on 09/30/2013 11:30:40 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: camle
chamberlain was put in a situation where he knew dern well that england could not stop germany from taking czech-via. the only thing chamberlain could do was buy time for england’s rearmament program to reap results before going to war with germany.

It's a complicated issue, but the only real argument should be over whether war in 1938 would have been fought more successfully than in 1939.

With Czechoslovakia and, potentially, USSR on the Allied side it is quite possible. However, France was, though nobody really knew it at the time, hollowed out by faction and defeatism, and USSR military was even more in turmoil from Stalin's purges than it was in 1939.

Interestingly, if Stalin had allied with UK, France and CS, there is some possibility Poland would have allied with Germany. Poland wanted its piece of CS, and for darn good reason was even more wary of USSR than Germany.

48 posted on 09/30/2013 1:38:37 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson