I agree with you about the playoff system, and I’m afraid that down the road it will just get worse. Eventually, they’re adding two teams (and most likely going to four divisions in each league) — at which point, I expect them to adopt the NFL system — the two lowest-seeded division winners against the two wild cards, with the two highest-seeded division winners waiting for them.
Wild cards damage pennant races, as Whitey Herzog, Bob Costas, and others have pointed out. In 1996, the Dodgers and Padres came down to the last day tied for the NL West lead. They both played their games like exhibition games because the “loser” had locked up the wild card.
That’s what the second wild card is intended to stop. It’s designed to create a strong disincentive to settle for teh wild card and keep everyone fighting for the division title as long as possible. That’s a good idea, but it merely papers over the real problem. The real problem is that we let non-winners into the playoffs. Take the Marlins, for example — two World Championships, nary a division title to their names.
See #24.
I hope they don’t go to the NFL system.
For what it’s worth, with the NFL at least you can argue that there are so few games a weak day or two through the season could justify allowing a wild card into the playoffs.
With baseball, though, there is little doubt about the long term best teams. One hundred and sixty two games later you find out who was consistently better against a large variety of opponents.
I hope they just go with champions. In reality, being champion of a 4 team division after 162 games is a fairly open opportunity for each of those teams.
I would prefer a tournament of champions.