Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterPrinciple

That did not happen.

Foods that do contain peanut products/derivatives say so on the label, the majority of foods are unaffected in the process.

For foods that DO contain peanut products/derivatives, the consumer is free to try to find a non-peanut alternative.

I don’t see that as being some sort of great burden/problem for manufacturers.

The same is true of phenylalanine. Foods containing it or it’s derivatives say so. And that is because there is a somewhat rare genetic disorder called PKU, and for people with PKU, even tiny amounts of phenylalanine will either kill them outright or make them spend the rest of their lives staring at the wall and drooling.

Is that a “useless” regulation?
Not if you have PKU. (phenylketylnuria)


25 posted on 10/20/2013 6:40:35 PM PDT by djf (Global warming is turning out to be a bunch of hot air!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: djf

It’s pretty easy to know if you have added peanut or Pa to your product. How do you assure that the stuff you buy does not have GMO in it?

For instance, how would you check your peanut flour to assure that the peanuts were not genetically modified?


27 posted on 10/20/2013 6:46:13 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: djf

Well, since it is no great burden/problem for manufactures, how about making the products that have no GMO post that fact?


47 posted on 10/20/2013 8:44:14 PM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson