>>It is a weak theory that demands and depends on persistent miracles but can’t predict when the next one will occur.
You’re right. It’s a weak theory. Since I do not create worlds or populate them with life, I do not have to know all the details of how it is done. Its like automatic transmissions: I know that they work, I know vaguely how they work, and I know a guy who fixes them. That’s all I need to know. I know a guy who creates universes and he’s good at it so I’ll leave the details to him.
Any evidence that he created a universe?
Any evidence that he is good at it? What would be ‘good at it’? How would that be different from ‘bad at it’?
You know a guy that fixes universes? How do you know? What universes has he fixed? What distinguishes ‘fixed’ from broken? If the guy who created the Universe was so good, how did it get broken?
Your statements to me seem so foolish that they are not even wrong.