Boykin specifically said that because of the civilian-military relationship, he did not see any prospect for a “coup” coming from the military ranks.Seitz-Wald took “(p)eople” and turned it into “(m)embers of the military” . . . talk about mendacity.
“People I’ve spoken to would like to see the military ‘fulfill their constitutional duty and take out the president,’” Boykin said. “Our Constitution puts a civilian in charge of the military and as a result a coup would not be constitutional. You’re not going to see a coup in the military.” …
Yes, they are totally twisting what he said.
“They’re referencing a comment by Boykin that appeared in WND, where he said that the notion of a military coup is out of the question.”
Thanks for that comment.
I was beginning to believe I was the only one that read it that way.
Leftist routinely take their assumptions, which are routinely wrong, and try to make facts out of them which are opposite from reality.