While the police with the help of the doctors certainly went way to far searching this guys backside, there is more to this story.
1) Police k9 unit detected drugs on the drivers side giving the judge reason enough to justify the search warrant.
2) Eckert had a criminal history of hiding drugs up his bum, he’s no saint.
That said, after the first examination it became “unreasonable”.
Eckert’s past history does NOT justify torturing the man. For the love of God, we treat TERRORISTS better than this!!!!
Haven’t you heard about police training dogs to do false alerts? (they never found any drugs)Just because one crooked cop tells another that Eckert had hidden drugs up his bum, you take that as sacred truth? According to the lawsuit it was not true, so don’t believe what that crooked cop says.
You believe in innocent until proven guilty?
I don’t think a dog alerting is grounds for a warrant. Too darn easy for the handler to signal the dog, consciously or unconsciously.
Sniffer dogs have their place but the average stop or questioning of a citizen is not one of them.
Also IMOthe whole war on drugs is far more harmful than the drug problem. Let’s legalize marijuana and opium derivatives - if they’re easy to get hold of, maybe there will be a lot of mellowed users, and fewer people raging around on meth or PCP.
While the police with the help of the doctors certainly went way to far searching this guys backside, there is more to this story.
1) Police k9 unit detected drugs on the drivers side giving the judge reason enough to justify the search warrant.
2) Eckert had a criminal history of hiding drugs up his bum, he’s no saint.
That said, after the first examination it became “unreasonable”.
Maybe you will be next!
Wait, May you be next!
There, got it.