While that may be the case, it is just a speculative theory, with nothing to connect it to the event other than more theory. My theory is practical, and establishes a step by step connection to a rationale of assassination—but it does not suggest who would be the assassins.
People certainly may act in cold blood out of greed or ambition, but they *will* act when faced with the existential fear of annihilation. It is a superb motivator.
The idea that an insane president may start a nuclear World War III at any moment could make anyone and everyone in the room consider reaching for their pistol to stop him.
>>People certainly may act in cold blood out of greed or ambition, but they *will* act when faced with the existential fear of annihilation. It is a superb motivator.
The idea that an insane president may start a nuclear World War III at any moment could make anyone and everyone in the room consider reaching for their pistol to stop him.<<
I see it from the other side. People do act in cold blood out of greed or ambition, but they *will* act when faced with the existential fear of annihilation.
We are now watching an insane president crush our American principles and individual liberties step by step into communist socialism and no one in the room is considering reaching for their pistol to stop him.
When Kennedy signed the Executive Order he was attempting to crush the Bankers power structure and they acted without hesitation.