They removed him from the scene.
It doesn’t say he was charged and I think it best to remove someone from the scene and give them a little time and space.
They’ll still grieve but, it will be less traumatic than watching as the house went down to the ground.
It really was for the best.
Pure psycho-babble
So the house was fully engulfed.
Would you let the guy run into certain death?
Give me your psych analysis or moral apogee for why he should be allowed to commit suicide.
If his baby fell over the side of a bridge, Golden Gate, would you allow him to fly over the edge after his baby, in a hopeless attempt to save the babe?