To: Olog-hai
Interesting concept. Sequenced lights timed to the speed limits would accomplish the same thing.
2 posted on
11/19/2013 12:49:02 PM PST by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
Sequenced lights timed to the speed limits would accomplish the same thing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They do that plenty here in Texas. I have heard that it is even against state law, but whatever.
Using red lights to regulate, slow down, and even stop traffic is common.
4 posted on
11/19/2013 12:51:25 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: USNBandit
When I was in college, we "discovered" that the lights on the main roads were timed - to about 10mph over the speed limit.
It's almost like the cities were encouraging you to speed. Surely, they'd never do that. It's all about safety, not revenue...
5 posted on
11/19/2013 12:54:10 PM PST by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: USNBandit
Sequenced lights timed to the speed limits would accomplish the same thing.
I think they work at other speeds too.
7 posted on
11/19/2013 1:01:42 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: USNBandit
Speed sensors cost more. So the companies which manage the revenue enforcement systems push them.
8 posted on
11/19/2013 1:04:27 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: USNBandit
Bad concept, imho. It would be much better to use these detectors to sync up the green lights with the flow of traffic, to keep everything running smoothly. Instead, they are going to do the opposite and clog up their streets even more.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson