Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Watches Albuquerque, New Mexico: Will It Ban Abortions After Five Months?
Life News ^ | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/19/2013 3:24:00 PM PST by Morgana

After months of a fierce campaign between pro-life advocates and abortion campaigners, who have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into keeping late-term abortions legal, voters in Albuquerque, New Mexico decide today whether or not they will ban abortions after five months.

The ban would have far-reaching effects, as it would prohibit abortions at Southwestern Women’s Options, a notorious late-term abortion facility that kills unborn babies by shooting them through the heart with poison. It is considered the largest late-term abortion facility in the United States.

“It’s very troubling, very barbaric, very unnecessary procedure that the public needs to [talk] about,” said Elisa Martinez of Protect Albuquerque Women and Children.

A recent national poll by The Polling Company found that, after being informed that there is scientific evidence that unborn children are capable of feeling pain at least by 20 weeks, 64% would support a law banning abortion after 20 weeks, unless the mother’s life was in danger. Only 30% said they would oppose such a law.

To turn out as many pro-life voters as possible, the Susan B. Anthony List is running one final radio ad on stations around the city urging voters to support ordinance. The script, provided to LifeNews, reads:

The whole world is watching Albuquerque today…because our special election is about a clear choice. Will we choose to protect babies in the womb who feel pain at 5 months? Or continue to be one of the few remaining places…to allow late-term abortions – right up to birth?

The Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Ordinance is literally a life or death choice. Voting FOR – protects babies’ lives and women’s health. Voting FOR – stops abortions after five months. Voting FOR – is the most human thing we can do. Will your vote show the world the human heart of Albuquerque?

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council puts the vote in context.

“Although the referendum is technically a local one, Albuquerque’s initiative would be felt throughout the whole country, since the city is home to some of America’s only late-term abortion providers. For too long, the city has been a destination for death, as moms travel near and far to take advantage of the area’s loose laws,” he said.

“In a sign of just how significant Tuesday’s vote is, money is still pouring in from national liberal groups — including President Obama’s Organizing for Action, Planned Parenthood, and the ACLU. Although the advertising dollars have been a boost to pro-abortion activists, money may not be as persuasive as the facts — which all point to the suffering of unborn children and the exploitation of pregnant women,” he added. “America is one of only four countries in the world that allow abortion past the age of viability for any reason. And supporting late-term abortion is the extreme position to hold even here, as 64% of Americans oppose abortion in the second trimester. Fortunately, those Americans are coming together to stand against the inhumanity — from Texas to New Mexico and Washington, D.C. — and hopefully, a city near you.”

Meanwhile, the Life Legal Defense Foundation, a pro-life legal group, is preparing to defend any legal challenges that follow its passage. The bill, labeled the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Ordinance, would ban abortions after 20 weeks. The organization tells LifeNews it is

uniquely positioned to shepherd the ordinance through any legal proceedings, having already defended the act against an attempt by Albuquerque City Council to prevent the matter from being included on the ballot.

“This municipal election is one that carries national import,” explained Life Legal Defense Foundation Executive Director Dana Cody, “because Albuquerque is home to the largest late-term abortion clinic in the nation. If Albuquerque’s voters pass this ban, it can be read as a clear statement that they no longer wish to be known as America’s late-term abortion capital. The lawyers of Life Legal Defense Foundation are ready to protect that decision on their behalf.”

The bill is similar to Congressional legislation that would also ban abortions after 20 weeks — which the House has approved and is pending in the Senate.

During the hearing in the House, former abortion practitioner Anthony Levatino told members of the committee the gruesome details of his former abortion practice and how he became pro-life following the tragic automobile accident of his child.

Another bombshell dropped during the hearing came from Dr. Maureen Condic, who is Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Adjunct Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Utah School of Medicine. She testified that the unborn child is capable of reacting to pain as early as 8-10 weeks. This is when most abortions in America take place.

The bill relies on the science of fetal pain to establish a Constitutional reason for Congress to ban abortions late in pregnancy. The science behind the concept of fetal pain is fully established and Dr. Steven Zielinski, an internal medicine physician from Oregon, is one of the leading researchers into it. He first published reports in the 1980s to validate research showing evidence for it.

He has testified before Congress that an unborn child could feel pain at “eight-and-a-half weeks and possibly earlier” and that a baby before birth “under the right circumstances, is capable of crying.”

He and his colleagues Dr. Vincent J. Collins and Thomas J. Marzen were the top researchers to point to fetal pain decades ago. Collins, before his death, was Professor of Anesthesiology at Northwestern University and the University of Illinois and author of Principles of Anesthesiology, one of the leading medical texts on the control of pain.

“The functioning neurological structures necessary to suffer pain are developed early in a child’s development in the womb,” they wrote.

“Functioning neurological structures necessary for pain sensation are in place as early as 8 weeks, but certainly by 13 1/2 weeks of gestation. Sensory nerves, including nociceptors, reach the skin of the fetus before the 9th week of gestation. The first detectable brain activity occurs in the thalamus between the 8th and 10th weeks. The movement of electrical impulses through the neural fibers and spinal column takes place between 8 and 9 weeks gestation. By 13 1/2 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in all parts of the body,” they continued.

With Zielinski and his colleagues the first to provide the scientific basis for the concept of fetal pain, Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has provided further research to substantiate their work.


“The neural pathways are present for pain to be experienced quite early by unborn babies,” explains Steven Calvin, M.D., perinatologist, chair of the Program in Human Rights Medicine, University of Minnesota, where he teaches obstetrics.

Dr. Colleen A. Malloy, Assistant Professor, Division of Neonatology at Northwestern University in her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in May 2012 said, “[w]hen we speak of infants at 22 weeks LMP [Note: this is 20 weeks post fertilization], for example, we no longer have to rely solely on inferences or ultrasound imagery, because such premature patients are kicking, moving, reacting, and developing right before our eyes in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.”

“In today’s medical arena, we resuscitate patients at this age and are able to witness their ex-utero growth and development. Medical advancement and technology have enabled us to improve our ability to care for these infants…In fact, standard of care for neonatal intensive care units requires attention to and treatment of neonatal pain,” Dr. Malloy testified. She continued, “[t]hus, the difference between fetal and neonatal pain is simply the locale in which the pain occurs. The receiver’s experience of the pain is the same. I could never imagine subjecting my tiny patients to horrific procedures such as those that involve limb detachment or cardiac injection.”

TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: abortion; albuquerque; newmexico; proaborts; prolife

1 posted on 11/19/2013 3:24:00 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; leapfrog0202; narses; little jeremiah

New Mexico/Abortion ping!!

2 posted on 11/19/2013 3:24:43 PM PST by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Strangely worded title. I almost thought that if some law were to be passed, then ALL abortions would be outlawed in this state 6 months from now...

Anyways, it’s nice to see some good news for a change. From my home page:

I’ve posted this in a couple of places and it doesn’t seem to get much more than a yawn, even though it’s kinda-sorta an incremental approach.

I believe a fetus is a human being who deserves protection under the law from being killed.
***I do too. That fetus deserves protection extended by the state.

I do wonder if it is biblical to extend “full” protection to a fetus? I.e. when a man hurts a pregnant woman, he’s expected to pay an eye for an eye & a tooth for a tooth. But if the unborn baby is killed, the price is not the same.

Perhaps it is time to consider a 3 (or even 4) tiered system of protection.

Tier 1: Living, viable, late term baby which will not be aborted unless the life of the mother is at stake.

Tier 2: Living, not-yet-viable pre-born human who should have the right to protection and life and a safe womb to which it can attain viability. Cannot be aborted unless there is an open rape case associated with the pregnancy or the life of the mother is at stake.

Tier 3: Living, early stage, not yet viable pre-born human for whom we do not extend the rights of life in this society because of a historical snag where we once considered such tissue not to be a baby. We as a society thought it was best to consider it a private decision. I personally do not believe in Tier3 abortions, but I can understand that there are many who think it is a “right to choose” at this stage. It may be time to consider a program where the woman declares her pregnancy and intent to abort. Our societal function at this point would be to provide a family that is willing to adopt this baby and to put up this woman for 6-8 months in a safe environment so the baby can grow and maybe the woman can learn some life skills. If our society cannot muster the forces necessary to save this baby, the woman has the sickening “right” to abort this pregnancy. Time for us to put up or shut up.

With a 3-tiered plan in place, women would stop using abortion as a means of birth control. Millions of lives would be saved. We would extend the right to life to every human that we have resources to save. Unfortunately, if we cannot put up the resources to save the Tier3 babies, we still would have this horrible practice staining our nation’s soul.

125 posted on 10/08/2007 1:43:20 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


3 posted on 11/19/2013 3:36:46 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; LegendHasIt; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; ...

New Mexico list *PING*!

Normally, we would know the results by the end of the evening. However, given the large number of early voting ballots and always problems with ABQ/Bernalillo County* reporting, it may be tomorrow before results are certain.

*Only ABQ is voting but IIRC the two share common facilities for tallying votes and problems have led to more than one Bernalillo County clerk being replaced next time by voters.

4 posted on 11/19/2013 3:36:48 PM PST by CedarDave (Small town America - last stand for God, freedom, civility, and American values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I happen to be an RN in a NICU for the last 35+ years. The pain is apparent on the tiny infants when we have to poke them; there is no justification for the torturous death of these innocent children.

5 posted on 11/19/2013 4:35:56 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (She accomplished nothing: should have stayed at home and baked cookies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; Morgana

All early votes and absentee ballots are supposedly counted as of a news blurb st 7 and the 20-week ban is losing 56 - 44%.

6 posted on 11/19/2013 6:20:39 PM PST by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: leapfrog0202; Morgana

Just posted a thread in the News Forum where it will be seen by more folks.

7 posted on 11/19/2013 6:34:24 PM PST by CedarDave (Small town America - last stand for God, freedom, civility, and American values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Unfortunately it isn’t good news. It appears that the voters are voting against banning abortions after 20 weeks.

8 posted on 11/19/2013 7:01:11 PM PST by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson