Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: expat1000

You ask a great question. They quoted him and then stated that it was “not a physical threat” in order to clear him, despite, no kidding, 15+ witnesses to the contrary.


10 posted on 11/25/2013 12:55:03 AM PST by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: KJC1
You ask a great question. They quoted him and then stated that it was “not a physical threat” in order to clear him, despite, no kidding, 15+ witnesses to the contrary.

Some how I doubt that your superiors chose not to charge him with making a physical threat to clear him.

More likely it was a CYA moment.

If they charged him with making threats against your life they would then have to explain not taking action earlier (assuming that earlier reports were made documenting his earlier threats).

Such individuals are often ignored or their aberrant behavior dismissed because dealing with them properly is a major hassle and often leads to legal complications.

But if the man does go off and harms someone and the documentation is there showing he was identified as a serious threat they will be in hot water. But the odds are with them and they are for the most part protected by law.

21 posted on 11/25/2013 1:29:48 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson