1 posted on
12/05/2013 8:40:37 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
But is it operational?
To: BenLurkin
Would this distance be extraordinary for a binary star pair?
3 posted on
12/05/2013 8:51:34 PM PST by
null and void
(I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
To: ClearBlueSky
4 posted on
12/05/2013 9:00:04 PM PST by
Shadowstrike
(Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
To: BenLurkin
And wouldn’t you know it, Algore told them where to look!
5 posted on
12/05/2013 9:00:18 PM PST by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: BenLurkin
9 posted on
12/05/2013 9:21:21 PM PST by
Bullish
(America should yank Obama like a rotten tooth before he poisons the entire body)
To: BenLurkin
Assumption, after assumption after assumption. “Just 13 million years old.” Prove it, how was it dated? How was it conclusively proven to be that age? This is what passes for real science. Nonsense.
10 posted on
12/05/2013 9:24:27 PM PST by
Fungi
To: BenLurkin
That is not a planet. It’s an infrared brown dwarf, a star that failed to ignite fusion because it’s slightly too small.
To: BenLurkin
It’s a red dwarf behind a Dyson sphere.
Obviously.
FReegards
14 posted on
12/06/2013 6:23:00 AM PST by
Ransomed
To: BenLurkin
About .01 light year separation.
Kind of close for a binary system, kind of far for a star/planet system.
16 posted on
12/06/2013 8:52:14 PM PST by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson