Skip to comments.
Juan Williams Defines Himself As A Libertarian - Fox News' "Cashin In" Panel Erupts In Laughter
yazchattiest/youtube ^
| Dec 15, 2013
| FOX
Posted on 12/15/2013 1:37:17 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: TomGuy
Geraldo is a big mouth attention seeker. Plain and simple. Why he is tolerated at FOX is beyond me.
21
posted on
12/15/2013 2:20:49 PM PST
by
billhilly
(Has Pelosi read it yet?)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Juan Williams is a liberal lapdog who would be a beat reporter covering high school crafts fairs were it not for affirmative action.
22
posted on
12/15/2013 2:33:43 PM PST
by
Baynative
(Wake me up early, be good to my dogs and teach my children to pray.)
To: Baynative
A Libertarian-—That’s a good one,
That’s not what I call him.
23
posted on
12/15/2013 2:40:20 PM PST
by
Venturer
(Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
It must be because JW sniffed glue when young.
That qualifies him as a Libertarian.
24
posted on
12/15/2013 2:41:09 PM PST
by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: ObamahatesPACoal
Bill Maher is
not a
Libertarian. And he is not a
libertarian, either.
He's a Big Government Guy, which no l/Libertarian can ever be. My Gawd, John Edwards was his Presidential candidate, fer cryin' out loud.
A liberal who wants dope legalized isn't a l/Libertarian.
25
posted on
12/15/2013 2:44:21 PM PST
by
FredZarguna
(Wink wink. Nudge nudge. Know what I mean? Know what I mean?)
To: ObamahatesPACoal
I loved it when the Libertarian Party declared on their website that Maher was no Libertarian.
Seems Juan bass the same problem Maher had.
26
posted on
12/15/2013 2:47:45 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: fso301
No there aren't. This is rubbish. It's like saying there are white black people and black white people. There are some libertarians who have "social" positions that can be considered liberal, but they're not liberal for the same reasons that liberals believe in them, and they don't EVER endorse government solutions to any kind of problems, even social ones.
They're also not conservatives, because their reasons for believing in a limited government with specifically enumerated powers don't spring from essentially conservative considerations, but from secular ones.
Simply because there's some overlap doesn't put them into either camp.
27
posted on
12/15/2013 2:50:13 PM PST
by
FredZarguna
(Wink wink. Nudge nudge. Know what I mean? Know what I mean?)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Liberals and their Jedi mind tricks but the only problem is that they don’t work. The only thing this Liberal has in common with a Libertarian is that both words start with an “L”.
To: Vince Ferrer
If it counted when fawning liberals called Bill Clinton the “first black president,” and the same are equivocating over Dear Leader’s credentials, then it will take a third before we really have a first.
29
posted on
12/15/2013 2:52:50 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
30
posted on
12/15/2013 2:58:11 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Doogle
From what I can tell, he’s not being *completely* ridiculous. He seems to be much more libertarian than the crowd he associates with...which are loopy leftist hate mongers.
31
posted on
12/15/2013 3:12:49 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Maybe he’s a white Hispanic who’s black.
32
posted on
12/15/2013 3:18:24 PM PST
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
When Juan appears on the TV screen I usually change channels.
At first I thought he was a riot because of his political naivety.
Now he is just an embarrassment. He doesn’t know the difference between a liberal and a libertarian. Pretty soon he will call himself a librarian.
33
posted on
12/15/2013 3:35:44 PM PST
by
353FMG
To: DManA
Its time we retire the word. Its meaning has become so confused that it detracts from any debate its used in. Agreed.
Today, it means "Democrat stalking horse in elections to split Republican votes."
-PJ
34
posted on
12/15/2013 3:55:25 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Juan Williams?
Really? Let's administer a test:
"minarchist or anarcho-capitalist?" Gold or bitcoins?
How do you feel about What do you think about Ayn Rand?
35
posted on
12/15/2013 5:05:21 PM PST
by
Lee N. Field
("You keep using that verse, but I do not think it means what you think it means.")
To: Berlin_Freeper
If Juan Williams is a “Libertarian”, then I was born of both white parents!
To: Berlin_Freeper
Fox saved Juan’s can after NPR kicked him to the curb. Fox should have left him there.
To: Berlin_Freeper
As did I upon reading the headline!
38
posted on
12/15/2013 5:36:06 PM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Juan as about as libertarian as Bill “ban guns” Maher.
39
posted on
12/15/2013 5:37:50 PM PST
by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: DManA
“Its time we retire the word. Its meaning has become so confused that it detracts from any debate its used in.”
It is no more “confused” than “Republican”, or “Conservative”, really.
Juan Williams clearly isn’t one, regardless. ;-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson