Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) makes controversial comments about homosexuality

FOXNEWS ^ | Dec. 18, 2013

[BenLurkin]

Hard to see what the controversy would be about that.

[Army Air Corps]

The Dalai Lama said that? That would blow the minds of many lefties I know.

[jersey117]

It’s not like the libs are watching their show or buying their products. Why should they are.

[bmwcyle]

Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) makes controversial true comments about homosexuality (FIXED)

[bmwcyle]

Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) makes controversial true comments about homosexuality (FIXED)

[glasseye]

ping

[mountn man]

Turn off the strike.

[Albion Wilde]

Living near Atl for the last 20 years... actually in a small town between Atl and the Bama border.. its like homo central around here...

Oh, okay, I see where you're coming from. But that's all big cities on both coasts north to south, and certain artsy "destination" towns like Asheville and Savannah, not the whole South, or just the South.

I enjoyed Columbus a lot when we were at Fort Benning.

[mountn man]

Beat me to it.

[who knows what evil?]

Disagree with queers, agree with G-d Almighty; and that makes you CONTROVERSIAL?? To quote Mr. Traficant; “Beam me up!”

[Colonel_Flagg]

So, saying “men and women are designed to have sex rather than men and men” is now ‘controversial’.

Sigh.

[lakecumberlandvet]

I’m still searching for the “controversial” part of Phil’s statement. Can’t find it.

[Arm_Bears]

I don’t think Phil would mind, quite frankly.

He’s already noted that production takes away time from duck hunting.

Phil ROCKS!

[Army Air Corps]

Well, the whole show is entirely non-PC. Hunting, celebration of private property rights, firearms, celebration of free enterprise, loving nuclear families, and so on.

[Responsibility2nd]

Question.

Did you post the GQ headline and an excerpt from the GQ article and yet use the Fox News link?

And why?

Are you looking to get this thread pulled? Hopefully the moderator will fix this and not pull it.

[bmwcyle]

This is my 10 day of working without a break. I am not typing well.

[driftless2]

I would bet if they gave most male libs a lie-detector test, they would agree that homosexuality is abnormal. Of course, few or none of them can say that openly in their own circles. In lib land, everyone muse praise homosexuality as being equal to heterosexuality. In fact, about a week ago I had a discussion with one of my lib sisters who refused to acknowledge that homosexuality is even abnormal. I said the usual conservative things, and she said the usual lib things.

So now I am a hater to my sister because I think homosexuality is abnormal, and I don't approve of homosexual marriage, child adoption, and a number of other things. I only approve of the right of homosexuals not to be persecuted for their weird sexual deviations.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

You need to apply for a FREE 0bamaTV

The problem with the ObamaTV is that Obama is on it 24/7.

[mad_as_he$$]

I saw what you did there....+1.

[hecticskeptic]

What Phil did was take the discussion in a direction that it entirely logical and correct but generally is avoided especially by those who promote homo acceptance… basically, he moved it away from the usual crap of softer open-to-interpretations concepts such as love and commitment and moved it straight to a discussion about sex. Nothing wrong with that and frankly, it is the only way to win this battle… the definition of marriage doesn’t deal with vague concepts.

The most hilarious part of this article is the comments from the GLAAD rep " Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil's lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe….." said GLAAD rep Wilson Cruz. Something tells me that the group specifically mentioned in the Bible as “not inheriting the kingdom of God” is not where I would normally go to find out what is true Christianity and what is not. 1 Corinthians 6:9