“WTH are you talking about????”
I think he means the second-to-last touchdown by FSU on the short slant play in the end zone with the phantom pass interference penalty.
Beyond that, I saw a few ref calls against Auburn that were non-existent but do not remember them specifically. I would have to see the entire replay to augment my comment.
Wasn't the second to last touchdown by FSU the 100 yard+ kick off return? Either way, that pass interference play in the end zone was hardly phantom. The Auburn guy was all over him the entire play.
The Big 10 refs let the Auburn defenders mug the FSU receivers most of the night missed a facemask on Winston and the Auburn player spiked the ball after their past score (unsportmanlike?) then after missing a horse collar and face mask on the SAME PLAY, they finally decided the toss a flag on the last mugging in the end zone with seconds left. With the final fortuitous results Go Noles!!!
There were at least two blatant facemasks on Auburn that the refs “missed” and at least one horse collar.
IIRC, FSU’s Winston was on the receiving end of both a Horsecollar and Facemask in one play on the final drive. No penalty. There was another missed horsecollar on a receiver running down the right sideline. The announcers commented on that one.
For the most part the refs seemed to be intent on “letting them play”. Auburn did get called on a blatant pass interference in the end zone. Than may be the penalty in question.
That’s absurd .first of all, the pass interference was on the last touchdown, not the second to the last, and it was clearly a blatant pass interference call .
You’re not even the poster who first mentioned this, but you’re both flat wrong.
Exactly!