Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
According to the victim, the pit bull was not friendly and had attacked her in the past.

A. This woman is a fool to go back after the first attack. B. Don't these people have a kennel? C. I'm no fan of pit bulls, but I can comprehend it making an honest mistake in the case of a seizure. Not it must go down, because the owner doesn't know how to deal with her dog.
2 posted on 01/09/2014 11:27:56 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (Five years, my brain hurts a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

Really? I blame the owner for choosing to own a breed of dog known to kill and maim, keeping his dog after it has bitten people and bringing his dog into contact with people again instead of penning it up.


3 posted on 01/09/2014 11:32:14 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

How much you want to bet the previous biting experience was explained away (the dog didn’t understand...) the way pit defenders will try to explain away this attack (the dog didn’t understand...) Is it safe to keep a dog that a)can’t get through a medical emergency among people without attacking and b) attacks its owner? It did say both women were attacked and sought treatment for their wounds. Just what did the owner do that the dog “didn’t understand?” He was in a ‘roid rage and wouldn’t allow its owner to stop him from attacking someone?


5 posted on 01/09/2014 11:36:37 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson