Fixed that for ya...
Yes, he shot back at the cops, but we don't know the whole story on that, do we? Nor will we, thanks to a the complicit MSM.
He only got 5 years for the dog. The other 30 years were for attempted murder of human beings the jack boot thugs hunting him down like HE was a subhuman.
Fixed that for ya...
Yes, he shot back at the cops, but we don’t know the whole story on that, do we? Nor will we, thanks to a the complicit MSM.
<><><><><
LOL. So you admit that you have absolutely no grasp of the facts, but you still feel entitled to call them JBTs even given your lack of said facts.
It's easy to assume that is the case.
We had an incident a few years back that happened in Henderson (about 25 miles S.E of Vegas) where cops used a no knock warrant on the wrong house in the early AM. (Confidential informant strikes again)
The home owner opened up with a few shot gun blasts against the intruders (IIRC, wounded one) and was subsequently charged with 6 counts of attempted murder on a police officer.
I wish I could tell you the outcome of the story but it got vaporized.
It's easy to assume that is the case.
We had an incident a few years back that happened in Henderson (about 25 miles S.E of Vegas) where cops used a no knock warrant on the wrong house in the early AM. (Confidential informant strikes again)
The home owner opened up with a few shot gun blasts against the intruders (IIRC, wounded one) and was subsequently charged with 6 counts of attempted murder on a police officer.
I wish I could tell you the outcome of the story but it got vaporized.
“Yes, he shot back at the cops, but we don’t know the whole story on that, do we? Nor will we, thanks to a the complicit MSM. “
Your bias shows. Why do you say he “shot back” at the cops. That impies the cops shot first. You don’t know that. Besides, why do you prefer to take the side of armed robbers?