Replies

Well, I'm going to go ahead and give the severely politically incorrect answer. I divide human thinking (among sane people) into two categories: feminine and masculine. The feminine is concerned with the immediate surroundings and immedite gratification (which could translate to hungry - need food now) while the masculine is concerned with the outside world and long-range planning.

Now, in a healthy society, you would have the feminine handling the imediate surroundings (household) and the masculine handling the bigger picture (society at large). The women would say "Hey, the kids are hungry, I'm hungry, we need clothes, the car doesn't run" etc etc and the man would figure out how to take care of these things. The women also demand security, and the men would figure out how take care of that as well. When these forces are in balance, we have a functioning society.

However, we are WAY, WAY, WAY out of balance on these things now, and a huge reason for this is that we have allowed the predominantly feminine half of society to be in charge of the larger picture (the masculine area of responsibility), where their short-range viewpoint does not produce good results when applied to long-range planning. The feminine don't understand the need for a strong military in peacetime, because they only think of short-term, immediate-vicinity goals, so prepring for a possible war decades out and thousands of miles away seems illogical to them.

The liberal voting base is excessively feminine. This includes the men as well as the women. Even the men have embraced feminine thinking, because it is the predominant political philosophy now, and most people are sheep who follow whoever has the lead. Also, some men are just feminine, period. Are they evil? No, but they are easily manipulated by those who ARE evil, because all the evil ones have to do is present the short-term emotional argument and voila, you have instant support. The main proponents of gay marriage, for instance, know damn well that it is a ridiculous idea, but their end goal is not "equality" it is the destruction of American culture and Christianity. Meanwhile, the feminine suckers think they are suppoorting "justice" and "love".

The freaks we see having in-your-face sex parades and vandalizing churches etc. ARE evil, but your average Dem voter doesn't identify with them. Your average Dem voter is a sheep being led around by the Devil.

And, just in case anyone missed my main point: we never shouod have given women the vote. It is not because women are evil, but it is because women, for the most part, do not have the proper world view for running the larger elements of society. They will always choose security over freedom, and will be prone to emotional appeals regardless of how silly and destructive they are.

“No, but they are easily manipulated by those who ARE evil, because ...”

Agree with most of your post but one can either participate in evil or not. The reasons do not matter. Justifications and ignorance do not matter. People saying ‘I didn’t know’ or “I was just following orders” share the responsibility of a given outcome they participated in. The Germans who turned their back on the gassing of the Jews are very much the equivalent of the pusssified men in your example.

They are evil in their actions because they help perpetuate evil. Now one can argue degrees...but evil is evil.

I find that people hate addressing this because they don’t want to say that their liberal ‘friends’ and members of their own families are evil. But it is what it is.