Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Fightin Whitey

His politics were of the naive ‘Peace on Earth’ variety. HE never joined any communist party as far as I know.


22 posted on 01/15/2014 12:20:58 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Borges; ETL
His politics were of the naive ‘Peace on Earth’ variety. HE never joined any communist party as far as I know.

Barack Obama's politics are of the naive "Equality on Earth" variety. HE never associates with any radical leftist or Islamic organizations as far as I know.

26 posted on 01/15/2014 12:30:42 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Borges
His politics were of the naive ‘Peace on Earth’ variety.

So he's rubbing elbows with groups and individuals who supported communist mass murderers like Mao and Stalin?

37 posted on 01/15/2014 12:49:15 PM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; mickie; pax_et_bonum; Maine Mariner; seenenuf; flaglady47; seekthetruth; Bushbacker1; ...
Chaplin never came out of the closet as a member of the Communist Party because he never registered as such for economic reasons....i.e., the health of his own wallet.

He was a Soviet-type marxist through and through.

You won't find many, if any, registered Communist Party members today in the entertainment/Hollywood/Broadway/media/arts professions, either......although we know there's plenty of them around in spirit. Greed and the love of money usually trumps ideology in the creative fields...so mum's the word.

Leni

42 posted on 01/15/2014 1:10:33 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Borges; Fightin Whitey

The “peace” bit gives it away. Communist activists in non-communist countries found it hard, and economically inadvisable, to come out and admit they were communists so they became involved in promoting “peace”, I mean who can object to peace? The peace oddly enough was a rather one-sided type of peace and it usually involved leaving communists alone in peace while at the same time blithely ignoring the violence committed by communist regimes.

They set up “peace groups”, funded “peace studies”, awarded “peace prizes” that oddly enough always favoured communists and pushed communist ideology. It’s odd that although Chaplin believed in peace at the same time he demanded a second front (apparently fighting the Nazis in the sea, in the air and in Italy and North Africa didn’t count) where ill-prepared western armies would be landed in France in 1942 or 1943 to be slaughtered by the Nazis while the Soviets got stronger and stronger. Funny sort of peace.

We can see the same thing today when anti-American activists never call themselves anti-American activists, they are always peace-campaigners or anti-war activists.

Chaplin was a commie fifth columnist, whether he was a useful idiot or a committed Red I will leave to the judgment of others.


84 posted on 01/15/2014 5:52:18 PM PST by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson