By the way the concept that a dead body may not be able to properly support a baby is not hyperbole, whatever the insulting word games you want to play.
driftdiver wrote: By the way the concept that a dead body may not be able to properly support a baby is not hyperbole, whatever the insulting word games you want to play.
If she had been properly dead, you’d be right. Brain death is not the same as systemic, cellular death.
If they were the same, as you are somehow trying to advocate either via ignorance, stubbornness, or some combination thereof, then there’d be no such thing as “life support”, and thus no controversy at all about any brain-dead patients in any situation.
And I hadn’t started out by insulting you, but now I am because I’ve provided an authoritative source about the subject and you seem to have ignored it in order to act all offended.
That’s a familiar tactic. It usually doesn’t work for us conservatives, but hey, whatever floats your boat Chumlee.