Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper

Counter-argument from Professor Gary Sheffield:

http://www.historyextra.com/feature/gary-sheffield-first-world-war-debate-german-victory-would-have-been-disaster-britain


9 posted on 02/01/2014 12:26:08 AM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: iowamark

The counter-argument is weak when one considers that Britain lost fewer people in WW2, being in the position that it feared if it didn’t intervene in WW1.

Moreover, it didn’t put a great value on avoiding that position circa 1932 to 1939.

Yes, Europe on the Continent would have been a bit darker if Germany had won, yet people still dined outside at street cafes in Paris even under an obviously much harsher and nastier 3rd Reich circa 1940-1944.

Kaiser Wilhelm was tame compared to Hitler, and besides, what the French lived under was hardly Great Britain’s concern.


13 posted on 02/01/2014 12:49:02 AM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson