All carbon-based, all use adp/atp energy cycles, all have the same basic cellular structure, and a myriad of other commonalities among them. And none of that counts as evidence?
None of that counts as probative evidence of transference between those animal groups. Concurrence is not the same as causal.
“And none of that counts as evidence?”
Sure, it can be evidence, but it can be evidence for either position. Evolutionists would say: “common features = evidence for common descent”, while creationists would say: “common features = evidence for common designer”.