“Cleveland should’ve pulled their team off the court if the refs let an ineligible player stay in the game. A smarter option would be to have to play a manager, ball boy or anyone else or complete the game with four players. It’s not right to let a team that’s mostly fouled out to still have players left at the end of the game....think of the precedent.
grrrr....what’s the point of having fouling out in the rule book if too many people fouling out means they can’t foul out anymore? Isn’t anyone in charge of common sense anymore?”
DID YOU READ THE ARTICLE FIRST?
Obviously NOT.
There were NO RULES BROKEN.
On this website we ACTUALLY are SUPPOSED to be the SMART ONES, we are not the liberals!!!
Okay, then why does the rule exist? I still stand by the statement that “no one’s in charge of common sense anymore”, which is even more true with a rule like that. It rewards breaking the rules.