Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Kinds translates into modern english...as Species.


30 posted on 02/08/2014 9:18:21 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("When you meet the unbelievers, strike at their necks..." -- Qur'an 47:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: MeshugeMikey
MeshugeMikey: "Kinds translates into modern english...as Species."

Sorry, but in no possible way is that true.
Just consider, the total number of species on Earth is said to be circa nine million, around two million of them named, with 13,000 more added each year.
Of those circa 6,000 are mammals, 10,000 each birds and reptiles, 30,000 fish and 300,000 plants.
Point is: there is no possible way all those "species" would fit into Noah's Ark, or even 100 Arks.

That's why, in his debate with Bill Nye, Ken Ham suggested "kinds" equates to some higher biological classification, such as: genus, order, family or class -- of which there are progressively fewer -- at some point few enough that "two of each" might conceivably squeeze into Noah's Ark.

Well, that's Ham's "solution" to the "problem" of too many species, but his solution itself raises problems, for example:

So, no matter how you look at it, biblical "kinds" make no sense scientifically.

34 posted on 02/08/2014 11:08:44 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson