Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Lanza's assets worth a total of $64,000 - not nearly enough to satisfy the families ...
The Daily Mail Online ^ | February 21, 2014 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 02/21/2014 5:47:37 AM PST by Uncle Chip

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Uncle Chip

I fear the Vampire Squid...irrationally perhaps...but...


61 posted on 02/21/2014 10:16:30 AM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Yes, i guess it might work that way. I know it does in Germany http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnenden_school_shooting, but there you have to keep your guns and your ammo in (separate) safes at all times.

Do you happen to know what constitutes adequate gun storage in Connecticut? If she fulfilled all the requirements i don`t see how she or her estate could be liable for any damages. Or maybe she wasn`t even supposed to have guns at all under the circumstances?


62 posted on 02/21/2014 10:53:25 AM PST by MoraBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I’m glad. Why should the victims be able to sue another victim? Her son was an adult. Sue HIS estate.

I certainly don’t expect to be held responsible for the actions of my adult children. Once they are 18, they are on their own.


63 posted on 02/21/2014 10:57:22 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
64k estate == poor. 290k income == rich. Go figure.

Maybe Adam's attorneys have already cleaned out the family's savings accounts.

64 posted on 02/21/2014 11:11:04 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MoraBlack
Do you happen to know what constitutes adequate gun storage in Connecticut? If she fulfilled all the requirements i don`t see how she or her estate could be liable for any damages.

What we're talking about here isn't a criminal trial...it's a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages.Given that,I think that it's the *jury* that decides what constitutes "adequate" security measures.If it can be proven,and I suspect it can,that the mother knew that her son had serious psychiatric,or neuropsychiatric,problems then the plaintiffs' lawyer will probably argue that she shouldn't have had *any* guns in the house lest that deeply disturbed son get hold of them.And as I suggested earlier,a jury in this part of the country is *very* likely to accept that argument 100%.So unless I'm badly mistaken (certainly possible) even if she was fulfilling the letter of any state and Federal laws that might have applied to her ownership,and storage,of firearms the jury could very well deem her to have been seriously negligent when it came to deny access to these firearms to her son.

65 posted on 02/21/2014 11:17:50 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
House is in her name..he paid her alimony..she paid the mortgage..the question is, if at the time of the divorce, the bank was willing to remove him from the mortgage..he's obviously the primary wage earner..assuming he was on it..

Just speculation on my part, but I'd wager that at the time of the divorce, he titled the house to her free and clear..all the debt, SHE incurred...it was the era of easy and cheap home equity loans..you got the sense that she lived beyond her means...

66 posted on 02/21/2014 11:39:36 AM PST by ken5050 ("One useless man is a shame, two are a law firm, three or more are a Congress".. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

You may be looking for the term “vicarious liability”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability


67 posted on 02/21/2014 3:23:06 PM PST by Fast Moving Angel (It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson