Ok! I did it! But it’s not a diver, it’s herself!!! I got it from that link to the blog. I watched the photos backward.
Image 19 shows this main person, is it supposed to be Fuddy?, from below her two feet, which are bobbing near the camera, the foot on the left, this person we are calling Fuddy’s right foot, is in a sock. It appears to be a white sock with black patterning on both the sole and the top of the sock.
Image 18 and 17 show that socked foot. The image makes it appear as though the dark part of the bottom of the sock comes up in a kewpie doll hair point, but that is just the turn of the foot and lighting freak. The outline of the foot is clearly foot shaped and larger than the black patternng.
16 is not close up, you still see the foot, which is starting to go under water or a wave in 15, as the forehead of the other person looms into the bottom right of pic.
14, you see the wave over the foot (which almost gone under water) and bigger dunk of the other guy’s forehead.
13 you can’t see that socked foot - it’s not above the water - but starting to see Fuddy’s body, wearing black or dark clothing - the shiny black that we thought might be a wetsuit. Could be a clinging dress but most likely jeans or something. What was Fuddy wearing that day?
From 12 to 10, you can see more of the leg or torso of Fuddy coming above water. Maybe knee. By 10 you can see that socked foot again. Clearly if this were a frogman he is between her legs so it maybe was a rape attack and not a murder, lol. Sorry, i know this isn’t funny. But no frog man would get THAT CLOSE.
By pics 4 and 5 the black part of Fuddy looks like her knee.
But on pic 7 and 8 there is something weird: the part of the black near that foot seems to have wrinkles around the ankle area like wrinkles around a tied balloon opening or -— sorry for the reference -— a rear end - or a pursed pair of lips. Can’t figure that out.
But it does look like the “frogman” is part of Fuddy. Especially if she had been wearing a smooth like jeans dark fabric that day.